IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-19

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 March 2023 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652B9C137390; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bbny6SdVMZsp; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9717C153CA0; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id cy23so28850656edb.12; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:39:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678513167; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BIlRr7YwkhTlS4vbubNx2V1bdMrmEj3K66XJdiJ0mtw=; b=iYmj9GxX2cGqfCkX+7hmRomOJmmhvff8vsx60hXedpnS0T92IrXFU7XE4BJV2z5vRq PZ+vnew+td/df11dr4tg4TI5t8ukOzpzxdgEaKpru+zV8JLXRuX7JN1RwD6ZnpON1FSI DwjlRyjAwl9ivDrNYsbmobLTDwt/EtKKiuc7kckmQ/ljpmW2nkJE0IjThGDAXbLsdyod UG3LCqSiJo0LkDFsQvTsZiT9k7yAnlrmZNAKUjogV6V/nNKDHGJmStCasAwv3usDXYA5 74XGRWQ/pyY+xw59mxfmyNgzMachEXi6taIF9GKRDl2ZoWKJxneO2CyCh8Klf8PRvREr 7Itw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678513167; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BIlRr7YwkhTlS4vbubNx2V1bdMrmEj3K66XJdiJ0mtw=; b=6vg/62G47gzxGSi1kaiCO9qGlkufyvECx/wTBi+H8Jw37dTFCQsDt9wF7XhN1qGcxk 1ipt0iha3J4k+DE4uNcVu3cbduUjeIwfxFdp+ldn9Lrv5yhmBuPcV54IRQLsLQtqXxAL OBnV/Rk8hVrrs6Oztx+t2p6NdyMLqXDaGjYtFbY5pmltTDA4pYvCTDE0WQHhT2maxfS0 x/3umic412VQKeShE+FciFIjey3ONDLsUcGbeWaiXIN0f6WwRCjiovHZKydx5OirXs/4 UBCjjDF4Xlt4XsSYbBSHPf/jBi2lD5fn1WIfirDnbu3mxSAvmZqowzbQ4YgpU+XxGDG8 3NqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW+VjV9xInAoKMPRhxvpRyIYgNdeeDNudkIec9YicSwqgYgNZu3 L6Eh933xf6vJKPQtwh5SQBxCRXkwjZ7e/3d5WVC4SlPc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/osJH65mrunuHoei78kaz25wkH3kVYfMjSUj2rWswPs/eLzTS+WQ3aUvYHEnfzlWUJbdvTv1vcLgzdfjQJtoU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3503:b0:8ab:2b8b:143d with SMTP id r3-20020a170906350300b008ab2b8b143dmr14366110eja.7.1678513166954; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:39:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsyqvrTH70NXGBpB9DLW6VHvpyY8TSm2m_rovXoxZKPyVQ@mail.gmail.com> <7A7004BC-FD6B-4159-85D0-AEA1FB047788@gmail.com> <CAMMESsyp_7VSwE5geAKagQJ5vaJCTDmQgYwTSFr2Kfwr7Njn=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESswkD0FkcmgsDjp80rcg3k9JyD7v8ZdCcn5r+WtViynHDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESszyqfb9aRKd6_ajHRf0bs7GCNLY2J7aXns-G5qTgzR50A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszyqfb9aRKd6_ajHRf0bs7GCNLY2J7aXns-G5qTgzR50A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 11:09:14 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPz+WUMTot116bWFwxBF1RkFCg0DRfoX9Py8tdEwyQ4JBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf@ietf.org, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, lsvr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011358905f6994d1a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/xv6Jr4FmdJsAMhYGcKOczJcoZdo>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-19
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 05:39:30 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

I see that BGP-SPF is a new/separate SAFI from BGP-LS and these two SAFIs
only share the TLVs. So, I don't see any issue with BGP SPF using the same
ASN TLV as BGP-LS as long as it says in the procedure that the "real" ASN
is what is encoded in the TLV.

The same goes for any other BGP-LS TLV that is used in a way by BGP-SPF
that deviates from the BGP-LS usage. Wouldn't that be a good way to go
about this?

Thanks,
Ketan


On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 12:44 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Given Ketan’s reply in the other thread, it may be cleaner to request
> a new TLV for BGP SPF ASN.
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On March 10, 2023 at 7:02:09 AM, Alvaro Retana wrote:
>
> > 5.2. Extensions to BGP-LS
> >
> > The format of TLV 512 is defined in rfc7752bis, when used in a
> > BGP-LS-SPF NLRI the content MUST be as follows:
> >
> > Autonomous System: Opaque value (32-bit AS Number). The
> > value MUST be set to the AS Number associated with the BGP
> > process originating the link-state information.
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email