IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Thu, 09 April 2009 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A043A6BA3 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcLYJQJIxRSt for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3473A68F5 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=RmqpbfrSAkinQoh4anvc1rURy5U9AbZqRsltN4OxW65f4DF2ZzA3nIqZ/xA5UlvD; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [68.166.37.221] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1Lri1N-0005mp-0c; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:21:33 -0400
Message-ID: <005701c9b8a9$68e39960$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090301210247.09515b90@localhost> <30b660a20903312133g733a4bbei4765c9f2ad7c7aea@mail.gmail.com> <49D31E17.6080305@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <49DD20BB.7040706@isode.com> <49DD2EE2.7040302@isode.com> <004301c9b8a6$5bcb45a0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <49DD3E4A.7020103@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:23:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d8886924630f8852f1735990f225d0d279dd73fb260bb18fbf1e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 68.166.37.221
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:20:27 -0000

Hi -

> From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:16 PM
> Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt
...
> After your explanation I think the sentence that reads "This memo is a 
> new work, not an incremental update of [RFC4645]" should be reworded or 
> removed. Otherwise it is just asking for a question: "if this is new 
> work, how come it is 4645bis"? At least it is not clear to me what the 
> WG is calling "new work".

As a technical contributor...

I'd prefer to simply delete the sentence.

Randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email