Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED
Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com> Wed, 01 April 2009 04:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2943A6804 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.723, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLqb9z6MvfZx for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A2C3A67F5 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so3586687wfg.31 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=ZI5ay6PF/CW2p4yaEii/NgPJtKniEbpxxKrGlOoN1XI=; b=aWs07Zu//b39UPS8IUZX2VQYKkS23hyURjxhhDSeyOErjP4alpO0p1jNJ1NC3yYv/W fT5K2uDJF2Nk5gXodfC4LYfOGsfLex7AaKpVi9WssSrSY0K54Nhw3nrr6Waq7Qs1M9hm HfsRTPjlkFkFCrIOQGttGC3c9+qm0/kn4zFCs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=F8XOTkBCxNfyPBgngCPyIocuv+ubtASIFKPIQqXCRbg62Z2euLqFpiCjqNK5uXpuT4 qnwTkfJnYLmEFqTUVp715f0Mw+ffwNhxuItSL8NJNIvH/7IKA8znUL12Yt2+PgvTgadU uIMnqT+4hJ++xWwVSOfL0PNQZwDtD8Oy2F1gU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.135.16 with SMTP id i16mr2946103wfd.250.1238560382135; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20090301210247.09515b90@localhost>
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090301210247.09515b90@localhost>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:33:02 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7d9be756bd6e264b
Message-ID: <30b660a20903312133g733a4bbei4765c9f2ad7c7aea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd328729c3081046676cf22"
Cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@sun.com>, Addison Phillips <addison@inter-locale.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:32:04 -0000
BTW, can someone point me to the tool for viewing the last call status? Mark On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 03:19, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Hello Chris, > > [I'm assuming you are the acting AD currently. > I'm cc'ing Alex so he knows what might be comming up for him.] > > I'm glad to finally request IETF LAST CALL for > draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis(-10) and draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis(-21), > the two current WG documents of the LTRU WG. > The intended status of 4645bis is informational, > the intended status of 4646bis is BCP (BCP 47 together > with RFC 4647, which stays as it is). > > I'm sending the shepherding documents in separate mails, > but I'm using this mail as a trigger; that's what Ted Hardie > told me to do when I did this thing last time. > > If I need to do anything else, please don't hesitate to tell me. > > Regards, Martin. > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp > >
- [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Martin Duerst
- [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] LAST CALL REQUESTED Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-1… Martin J. Dürst
- [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-D? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Phillips, Addison
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ltru] Ltru consensus call: rename 4645bis I-… Alexey Melnikov