Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress)

Marion Gunn <mgunn@egt.ie> Wed, 14 February 2007 16:21 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHMsS-0001UV-VC; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:21:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHMsR-0001U4-Du for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:21:03 -0500
Received: from mail07.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net ([159.134.118.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHMsQ-0001CQ-4f for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:21:03 -0500
Received: (qmail 49582 messnum 2902371 invoked from network[194.125.174.59/ts09-059.dublin.indigo.ie]); 14 Feb 2007 16:21:00 -0000
Received: from ts09-059.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO ?194.125.174.59?) (194.125.174.59) by mail07.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 49582) with SMTP; 14 Feb 2007 16:21:00 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728)
In-Reply-To: <20070214130638.GA21542@nic.fr>
References: <E1HH5Ws-0007lk-GC@megatron.ietf.org> <002501c75011$ad023e60$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <20070214130638.GA21542@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <2711F304-8A45-4085-89C7-D176FDCBA55C@egt.ie>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Marion Gunn <mgunn@egt.ie>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: "Placeholder" dates in draft Regsitry (was: Re: Progress)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:23:34 +0000
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Would such a placeholder as 6666-06-06, 7777-07-07 or 1111-11-11  
break such systems, Stephane?:-)

A quick google for 2008-01-01 finds ten whole pages <http:// 
www.google.ie/search?as_q=&hl=ga&num=10&btnG=Cuardach 
+Google&as_epq=2008-01-01&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr= 
all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=> of events scheduled to happen  
on 2008-01-01, should we live so long.

If you believe that it is not a problem for LTRU to declare  
2008-01-01 a "fictitious" date for its own purposes, then I respect  
your right to hold to that as a matter of principle I do not  
understand, but I do not think that particular choice to be  
intrinsically important and I do believe that a less ambiguous (more  
obvious) placeholder would be less confusing (more help) to human  
readers reviewing the text.
mg

On 14 Feb 2007, at 13:06, scríobh Stephane Bortzmeyer:

> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:25:24AM -0800,
>  Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net> wrote
>  a message of 27 lines which said:
>
>> Does anyone else feel this would help?
>>
>
> -1
>
> It would break type checking systems (SQL database with CONSTRAINTS,
> XML with schemas, etc).



- -
Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991)
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an
Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire.
* mgunn@egt.ie * eamonn@egt.ie *


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru