[Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft
"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Fri, 07 December 2007 20:07 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jU5-0004LY-LR; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:07:41 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jU4-0004LC-EO for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:07:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jU4-0004L2-4c for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:07:40 -0500
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jU3-000676-PN for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:07:40 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=To1E6Ph889qx4p+4g3geitIMJ5T5ZCIFM37TCNi7KvmYQle/hLxgqtXOP0R0Kz0K; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [64.105.34.95] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1J0jU1-0006br-55 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:07:37 -0500
Message-ID: <001001c8390d$18576d40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:09:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a4beb055f130b31a096d8ac37c4fb706c14174237f9d4df3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 64.105.34.95
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Hi - As a technical contributor... RFC 4646 and internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-09.txt Clause 2.2.5. (1) say: 1. Variant subtags are not associated with any external standard. Variant subtags and their meanings are defined by the registration process defined in Section 3.5. One could read this to mean that if there is an "external standard" for something, it would consequently be ineligible for a variant subtag. I'd hope that it's simply a bad choice of words variant subtags associated with external standards (e.g., the German orthographic reforms) are very useful things.) Randy _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Randy Presuhn