Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft
Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> Fri, 07 December 2007 20:15 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jbm-0003p4-5K; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:15:38 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jbl-0003ox-67 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:15:37 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jbk-0003op-Sb for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:15:36 -0500
Received: from rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.228.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jbk-0006c3-6x for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:15:36 -0500
Received: from [172.21.37.80] (duringperson-lx.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.37.80]) by rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id lB7KFQCa032619; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RiMdA60GhDBCmS6dpUE9K8594l5y9fHt7rsoRjEQRNnGfcfFQjYlw4D2Xqoh3nGf
Message-ID: <4759A9DE.2060802@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:15:26 -0800
From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft
References: <001001c8390d$18576d40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
In-Reply-To: <001001c8390d$18576d40$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -15.0 (---------------)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
> > 1. Variant subtags are not associated with any external standard. > Variant subtags and their meanings are defined by the > registration process defined in Section 3.5. > > One could read this to mean that if there is an "external standard" > for something, it would consequently be ineligible for a > variant subtag. I'd hope that it's simply a bad choice of words > variant subtags associated with external standards (e.g., the German > orthographic reforms) are very useful things.) > How about: -- 1. Variant subtags, as a collection, are not associated with any particular external standard. The meaning of variant subtags in the registry is defined in the course of the registration process defined in Section 3.5. Note that any particular variant subtag might be associated with some external standard. However, association with a standard is not required for registration. -- Addison -- Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc. Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature. _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] clause 2.2.5 (1) in 4646bis draft Randy Presuhn