Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag

Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> Fri, 15 September 2006 16:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOGDF-0000ME-M8; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:06:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOGDE-0000M0-LG for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:06:44 -0400
Received: from rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.228.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOGDD-0005AS-As for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:06:44 -0400
Received: from [10.72.72.2] (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c2.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.rout) with ESMTP id k8FG6GaV087476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qDuMQ9brVvl5S7MUe4vvIiKPXdhNc9tTJOiKp8212dsgyhwQ72l6YdE7CaFQtqAY
Message-ID: <450ACF78.4080909@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:06:16 -0700
From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Can't add a Preferred-Value to a redundant tag
References: <003c01c6d637$6e6c6260$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <4506D714.4020705@yahoo-inc.com> <004301c6d6e1$72276d50$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <450826A0.2000206@yahoo-inc.com> <30b660a20609130901q18d1e97eu2370953c30d34062@mail.gmail.com> <005601c6d803$01e627c0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <45097776.4090800@yahoo-inc.com> <002d01c6d870$0bb62120$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
In-Reply-To: <002d01c6d870$0bb62120$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -15.0 (---------------)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Doug Ewell wrote:

> 
>> But ultimately, I think the best course of action is:
>>
>> 1. Allow the registered meaning to remain, keeping the description 
>> (even though it could be broadened). Consider it historical.
> 
> Figuratively, of course.  There is no such formal category in the 
> Registry (like "Deprecated") and I assume you are not proposing one.

Yes, of course. "Type: redundant" is pretty much "historical" anyway.


-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru