Re: [Ltru] extlang and stability of macrolanguage

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Sat, 24 May 2008 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052BE3A6A31; Sat, 24 May 2008 05:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211DB3A6985 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 May 2008 05:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.271
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.271 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.154, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.219, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY=2.696]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWB-3OEp2Pgy for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 May 2008 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.251.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9303A6A26 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2008 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse2 [133.2.253.17]) by scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id m4OClPj8014328 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:47:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 2292_8f74cb3e_298f_11dd_805c_0014221f2a2d; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:47:25 +0900
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:42795) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S2D35A> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Sat, 24 May 2008 21:42:08 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20080523185603.0730a790@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 19:05:14 +0900
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, "ltru@ietf.org" <ltru@ietf.org>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E268413F@NA-EXMSG-C117.r edmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <mnet2.1211495247.7439.nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com> <002901c8bc7b$de7889e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E268413F@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] extlang and stability of macrolanguage
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

I'm somewhat confused. Romans(c)h and Rhaeto-Romance are simply
alternate names for one and the same language. So I'm not sure
why there is talking about a narrowing or change.

Regards,    Martin.


At 11:47 08/05/23, Peter Constable wrote:
>> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Randy Presuhn
>
>
>> > The meaning of rm has changed in january 2007
>
>
>> The descriptions taken by themselves make this look like a narrowing
>> of the category.  Was this the intent?
>
>The change in the LSTR matched changes made by the ISO 639 JAC. As part of 
>evaluating ISO/FDIS 639-3 and considering how rm/roh should relate to 
>entries in Ethnologue, while the MARC language code list did indicate that 
>roh was used as a collective for Ladin and Romansh, it was clear that there 
>were many other uses of rm that were specifically Romansh, and the JAC 
>representatives from LOC and other libraries indicated they considered it 
>appropriate in ISO 639 to clarify the denotation as Romansh.
>
>Keep in mind: prior to publication of ISO 639-3, the denotation of IDs in 
>ISO 639 was documented only in terms of certain names, which in general are 
>not alone an adequate means of documentation. Part of the change with ISO 
>639-3 was to begin to document denotations in terms of a larger body of 
>information of a more encyclopedic nature, something that was unavoidable 
>in determining how the existing entries should relate to the large 
>collection of new entries that would be added to the code. This was simply 
>one of many decisions regarding more specific determination of denotation 
>for existing entries that were explicitly or tacitly made.
>
>Btw, this change was made before ISO 639-3 was approved; IMO, it is not a 
>case of a macrolanguage being added.
>
>
>
>Peter
>_______________________________________________
>Ltru mailing list
>Ltru@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru