Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates

I haven't followed ISO 639-6 since there were (premature?) announcements of its possible demise. It might make a suitable extension (in which case no WG is needed). Or, when it is mature, couldn't we just create a new instance of LTRU with a new charter at that time? 

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:46 AM
> To: Randy Presuhn
> Cc: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Geocoordinates
> 
> Randy Presuhn scripsit:
> 
> > If you wish, you may include this as part of a proposal to re-
> charter
> > this working group.  However, I currently plan to recommend
> closing
> > the working group when its current deliverables are published.
> 
> What about the variant and (genetic) collection codes from ISO 639-
> 6?
> That standard is at FDIS stage, and while we certainly shouldn't
> hold
> 4646bis on it, it seems to contain material for a 4646ter.
> 
> --
> John Cowan    http://ccil.org/~cowan  cowan@ccil.org
> The Penguin shall hunt and devour all that is crufty, gnarly and
> bogacious; all code which wriggles like spaghetti, or is infested
> with
> blighting creatures, or is bound by grave and perilous Licences
> shall it
> capture.  And in capturing shall it replicate, and in replicating
> shall
> it document, and in documentation shall it bring freedom, serenity
> and
> most cool froodiness to the earth and all who code therein.  --
> Gospel of Tux
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru