IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] The LWIG Challenge

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 04 July 2014 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AD81B2CE3 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 03:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJZrijDEJJSw for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 03:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2EEA1A0ABF for <lwip@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 03:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.131.128] ([80.92.115.50]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYfX0-1X6jeZ0DgI-00VPsl; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:17:25 +0200
Message-ID: <53B67F31.5070108@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:17:21 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Cao, Zhen (CZ)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com>, lwip@ietf.org
References: <53B515B2.2080402@gmx.net> <017b01cf976c$d0b5a0e0$7220e2a0$@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <017b01cf976c$d0b5a0e0$7220e2a0$@chinamobile.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0LQQCUD85FlEaV2sRhKsWjQdsUNLWX1jg"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uGFVDmHWl/mcErJbJIw8X/E7A/iFEHWsIl2B3Qb2Zz86QXl0BPY 9ggufavOsE+QpOEcSQ72GLx+HLxXGU+eMiHUKhmXEonDC9PObzNl6u4cTlJkcpMI1Do5YsN g5hf9QjRzZ7N6MBopjjWevNrWrmuOrWSoRduvCsyscUE7Hg+XEjiejqe9NhSM3+mvoykVHP NVjWakTPMNifO5WnXjDNA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/bL7XZ4hKGC22UjgHF9gr_m-DRhU
Subject: Re: [Lwip] The LWIG Challenge
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:17:29 -0000

Hi Cao,

> The cellular document was indeed a memo when the authors started to
> work on communication protocols, the document is very useful for
> readers and implementers when they approach the problems.

What did you learn when you read this document?

> Finally I would like to propose some work items for your
> consideration and discussion, 


- Requirement document for constrained
> devices (sensors and gateway nodes) w.r.t. the IP layer
> functionalities.
> - A survey document of constrained device developers
> (some do that for IPv6), link layer, battery life, applications
> profiles and etc.

Could you provide further details about what you think could go into
such documents?

Ciao
Hannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email