Re: [Lwip] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)

[Carles Gomez Montenegro <[e-mail]>]

Hi Robert,

Thank you very much for your review!

We just submitted revision -12, which aims at addressing the comments
received from the IESG and related reviewers:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-12

Please find below our inline responses:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this document.  It is somewhat outside my area of expertise,
> but
> I do not see any network management related issues.
>
> One minor comment:
>
>     3.2.  Usage scenarios
>
>        There are different deployment and usage scenarios for CNNs.  Some
>        CNNs follow the star topology, whereby one or several hosts are
>        linked to a central device that acts as a router connecting the CNN
>        to the Internet.  CNNs may also follow the multihop topology
>        [RFC6606].
>
> Perhaps: "Alternatively, CNNs may also follow ... ", otherwise it feels
> like
> this paragraph stops quite abruptly, whereas from the first couple of
> sentences
> I was expecting it to say a bit more about the different deployment
> scenarios.

We applied your suggested change.

Thanks,

Carles (on behalf of the authors)


> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
>
>