IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 30 October 2020 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6463A0DCB; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Io4r64dX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=wRKJqgch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WS_liiXb-6kW; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E065C3A0DCA; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2698; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604053340; x=1605262940; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xLzcmJ7AJt/jM5PPHg/KLWqE9fRkHyUxNqeifZOKY+U=; b=Io4r64dXimoB1zvwayTAi7/T+3ekqRew3YIxT7+4HmzltjVTqpcctvRf 2RDEbi6VDuDhtJ68wILh2tMk8sc65O1jgvRD4GrMA9MMjztWYi0Snqh3m WBADf6/p+Z4XPhRbaAAQ+8w0Y3HS0L6KyTfdG91rTO69cqu9eEJlMEAVh g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:sFv4HBCShJFDil3GGlkaUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw31g3EW5nW77RZk+GQvqz9CiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFxoIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNFDUvnC2qyMKEVPyORcmbujwE5TZ2sKw0e368pbPYgJO0Ty6Z746LBi/oQjL8McMho43IacqwRyPqXxNKOk=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuCAD555tf/4gNJK1iDnuBT4FSUQdwWS8uCod8A41MihKObIFCgREDVAsBAQENAQElCAIEAQGESgKCBwIlNwYOAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEcYVhDIVyAQEBAQMSKAYBASkOAQsEAgEIEQQBAR8FCyERHQgCBA4FCBqDBYJLAy4BAwujIAKBO4hodIE0gwQBAQWBR0GDIg0LghADBoE4gnKKSBuBQT+BEUOCTz6CG0IBAQIBAYEmARIBI4NIgiyQO4JpAZNgkBkvVAqCbIkIjGqFNYMXihGUPp4/gm2SWgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaiRnWBEHcBWDJFAXAg2OVoM6hRSFBEB0OAIGCgEBAwl8jDsBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,432,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="594638290"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Oct 2020 10:22:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09UAMI09014351 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:22:18 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 05:22:18 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 05:22:18 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 05:22:18 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TCrybT1au/NZ+/0jqlf4dVCjjJvlj7+ojTkv2tzxAU2Q6NRjtyPbUuZHZ6D13K5shgZ1x2x1b94v4BarTA3BAke1ADDPpQ3qCOUL7xM6SEVBBZpCNpVEkMYAV4ojVpu2c+4VjeEW1Mf1cfYKkunSrWjCwIajdtQ/aqmuhed8esF8tUz/YlWz5yIPH1vyHCvIA49T1VX9I6QlBLWPQL0GvH22Ta/BphLPcdhVTpEDt3YJxinQh5Kzc1hIlbVgpM11KvXBEz9XaQ/7Gno3F0d0b7QpwqRq1CHlm1W7YlqB4TXS7Vq2kw8GAsGRM0H54ekbAqVbyEJdR62LXezGKxUEhw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OSUXtAs5Ffj7PRewlYh6CSXwJ/SoSx+SK/kIpZ6Euns=; b=QHwKCJgZiWaS1dnrsLajfhExbXjpU278mdv3mdxii34VfuLFL85wAHkqVQZJAX0Mf1JyDm3D92RW2085+0x3diELnZlLmlkUa7+xmYMTUSyeBV//Il8y8yA49HTXmRc61g0mvBM4v7YdVHKt5AzDFQRG/5dR2ZoRJg1OGoxRVazBz9esOZpmD/CIr5+BUvua+cpFv3O7rMC/Ica0V6bMD+gnGP7BexOYDS+8wixQMFWSSTUU2hfR3z4+u4E5eeYFYHXZ2rVwCZ6D2yXuxdN5Yy3mXzjkhqeLd8GmW1bSUfiDk5+tl8I4bc6hmheKBAvi9WdGFmKHClpAqZQVU0j2Jg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OSUXtAs5Ffj7PRewlYh6CSXwJ/SoSx+SK/kIpZ6Euns=; b=wRKJqgchDqhML4ugmHe9+ULZMLMBjiKEB4xrcci/3ZBaHpoHL2oXmSuSCHeTMMHy9XRdyJpzKbad3GgYvoifsmMi0QO2nWfKUBto8pmO77opYY9HkBVQfBAU0grLEZQ7gJbUSM/6NPGzDEw3+xZH+Z8bEP40twGhZgF86/GrjlY=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB4631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:262::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:22:17 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d84a:115:9ce0:8241]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d84a:115:9ce0:8241%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.034; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:22:17 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org>, "lwig-chairs@ietf.org" <lwig-chairs@ietf.org>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWptUzBOElGLwRBE+5SvIxYCyhTamv1OCAgAAqZ3A=
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:22:16 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366A89855633BE20818B5C1B5150@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <160319373981.10163.14174684375070956360@ietfa.amsl.com> <94c987d9300e27442eab212d85e2e6f1.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <94c987d9300e27442eab212d85e2e6f1.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: entel.upc.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;entel.upc.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.12.233.180]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 04c5f965-9507-4f9e-9192-08d87cbdad4b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4631:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB46318F961D22C3FBD64790D0B5150@MN2PR11MB4631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: e9x2d3EGHAan29Q5cFAKTBADXic9semdR5tbnyRfTwhowVdxPUpvMeWp7Sl8uRnfiqTkxiBj/phJ+DSFyytsWsanJ7wMhiZWgG64Ft4s8CBjlh1uNYv5xOSc3Y83vFJGi1/tkPCS2q+DW3wdO0TNeBKzQBDXZoP7ktVkEmuw4yMjVadin3Nbr2pGT3Xua7bgnfMqovdfbIFZOI94ike4dN21mDAO1Ua083dEnwL9PNGrz0Zdm3zbrv/8bmnMajNFy53AizF8GYKZD8csOWQiMr+BpmzlCuV27UV4d7cddTfgiJHRNoHK51JTozojRj6j5GxFNmtQGpvf1kuTTrqfL90nINhp3WBFoZ9BR8tdBNRLea6qs47lkFEVyhvPos2JAwid1kc31c2vzq9Pd/mOHQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(64756008)(66946007)(66446008)(66476007)(66556008)(8936002)(316002)(86362001)(52536014)(9686003)(5660300002)(55016002)(2906002)(54906003)(8676002)(6916009)(71200400001)(76116006)(83380400001)(33656002)(26005)(6506007)(186003)(53546011)(66574015)(478600001)(4326008)(7696005)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 04c5f965-9507-4f9e-9192-08d87cbdad4b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Oct 2020 10:22:17.0059 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WCjeJm1eEdTeqIeqNVJorGmQtKScUe6g3VE6RStEAEXZp/ADPC2MExOTV1C1Em0/dHtmHYHT5rqM0KUZbW+H2w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4631
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/mfkdboAa9MYUsjKDKnvJ5xehOkU>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:22:22 -0000

Hi Carles,

Thanks for confirming.

Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
> Sent: 30 October 2020 07:50
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
> Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-
> networks@ietf.org; lwig-chairs@ietf.org; lwip@ietf.org; Zhen Cao
> <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-
> constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> Thank you very much for your review!
> 
> We just submitted revision -12, which aims at addressing the comments
> received from the IESG and related reviewers:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-
> 12
> 
> Please find below our inline responses:
> 
> > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-
> networks/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this document.  It is somewhat outside my area of
> expertise,
> > but
> > I do not see any network management related issues.
> >
> > One minor comment:
> >
> >     3.2.  Usage scenarios
> >
> >        There are different deployment and usage scenarios for CNNs.
> Some
> >        CNNs follow the star topology, whereby one or several hosts are
> >        linked to a central device that acts as a router connecting the
> CNN
> >        to the Internet.  CNNs may also follow the multihop topology
> >        [RFC6606].
> >
> > Perhaps: "Alternatively, CNNs may also follow ... ", otherwise it feels
> > like
> > this paragraph stops quite abruptly, whereas from the first couple of
> > sentences
> > I was expecting it to say a bit more about the different deployment
> > scenarios.
> 
> We applied your suggested change.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carles (on behalf of the authors)
> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email