IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 30 October 2020 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682423A0855; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=SPMFG9o1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kYnIPng7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OnuTHdeBNLb; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BA83A0BAB; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3966; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604055252; x=1605264852; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=DQaQCQ3vAcK2PUvjN7R9TwBk1+QDQKTBAd7WzhFn/TU=; b=SPMFG9o14O81nCq12Y0tSkmz571MAno4LpzUwMGyZ1levtEQRs8UVJ19 8+QPD7F8opagKQ63IeSUtX9VYgDGh/FA29bKY/Q14vJNcAbtCTt0X+Etw yfOUmAiHST0nu4PdckRo8zLG9ul56mcNMIXZGrnU7/bc9ciT7hAn9kbtJ Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:IwN6Yxc75DslWkAY3JBSGBUglGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaQAdfQ6ulPjKzdtKWzEWAD4JPUtncEfdQMUhIekswZkkQmB9LNEkz0KvPmLklYVMRPXVNo5Te3ZE5SHsutbFzJqXr05jkXSV3zMANvLbHzHYjfx828y+G1/cjVZANFzDqwaL9/NlO4twLU48IXmoBlbK02z0jE
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AnCgBu8Jtf/5ldJa1iDhABAQsSDECBRAuBUlEHcFkvLgqBKYMKg0kDjSYmhS2TUYFCgREDVAsBAQENAQEnBgIEAQEPhDsCF4FwAiU3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRxhWEMhXIBAQEBAgESEREMAQE3AQQLAgEGAhgCAh8HAgICMBUFCwIEDgUigwQBgksDDiABDpJRkGoCgTuIaHaBMoMEAQEFgTcCAQ1BgyUYghADBoEOKoJyg3GCKYQuG4IAgREnDBCCTz6CXQEBAQIBgSYBEgEHgzEzgiyQO4JqPaM8gQMKgmyJCJF9Ax+DF4oRlD6EXJljlUcCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWokZ1gRB3AVZQGCPlAXAg2OHwwXFIM6hRSFBEB0AjYCBgEJAQEDCQF7jDsBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,432,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="591087345"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Oct 2020 10:54:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09UAsBm8030575 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 05:54:10 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 05:54:10 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 06:54:09 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=j/iyhIBEdtRHj4pwLA6S9ghggv4dL6//iTZPhIHvjYqtGcQPkK4fPIPtbh19BXNAmuQ39U2LtmBorw7ifzN2/gBsbXOTlxux8ijMjbeY/4OXu337ou5wauB5X9MMbvEmdiZ6/FPzieZ8T4NYwzbcjbUDlhNi/2lamrPvIVT1Lfb8sQ9uS9xl1gakmNmfmL70+qo6m/NAjyXI1XhPYtie+Kb8151DkGBznlAsErgNQ5iUtKBa0Z+2wRzYJ4BukrhSa6D3ni0nGp7po58039WErmz6WknerSeC1XNZPNrNCdJC/BYilfmS9oLLmDAhyo3qR8PugpViaW9N/bNsO96D2w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DQaQCQ3vAcK2PUvjN7R9TwBk1+QDQKTBAd7WzhFn/TU=; b=NO5F67ojR77PhMm4C4vEwYLkIrAqyrNedd28oHt3CUjjK3PRNSTuetSHl3CLu9JPA5o62aybhO9D9BoGB4dAijbknKTsKIuJ/kiICUnO+EwpTl0lmtdFkpQt3MERlPREBJga09m1+L3NXIYV7XNkaBkVUaOicWAhX3tKORwpe6RDfKaACDw1GSlZqLKScFIANpCQSPAWNtsW8pPaazLsrILl8GnUWhqWs70pPKavMM8jCa9zCMAdrfXj+iLNTqaysjcvkYsOdHq/YhMjqAEc8JJrukPgpViOLlkJv793f/f15OekGO6nzhlcw4PoixW0QtH9KbHe6krwNqijd8gEUQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DQaQCQ3vAcK2PUvjN7R9TwBk1+QDQKTBAd7WzhFn/TU=; b=kYnIPng7lqgBhiz8vmSnWFP5f0VGHgtNxtpSGkd4i8b+4Nbbci0yoQsPKfnfa84eQfa2J8N5vNxILS9tDk8B/ej/EHO4ZstIBjzu1QLDXm9M03Qt4BhgG8PRRCqhG5tyTuqHuTHWCXr8bd/KnPedK44/bMAOruT/Zn2aK7Eqiis=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:af::18) by BN8PR11MB3586.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:84::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.25; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:08 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1dc1:e7f4:84ef:3711]) by BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1dc1:e7f4:84ef:3711%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.028; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:08 +0000
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
CC: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>, "mariainesrobles@googlemail.com" <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, "draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org>, "lwig-chairs@ietf.org" <lwig-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lwip] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWqEJXmLO0IPgnwUyL6Dy4tPVFu6mv2d+AgAArl8Q=
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:08 +0000
Message-ID: <C59110AC-B75A-4605-9557-11451F6E1354@cisco.com>
References: <160335048409.27318.16100790935050931969@ietfa.amsl.com>, <ed0f84486a55681e81fc16e3fb610262.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ed0f84486a55681e81fc16e3fb610262.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.233.121.124]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 56ad4da7-6961-432f-8056-08d87cc2207e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3586:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB358661AFF311A333CD4FC490CF150@BN8PR11MB3586.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: u0zp5kmZf6khM6qZD1mkjgqlRprMozxO5g8phJ4MtnucxpXr9o956zrsQU8H6vd6Y6lw69BgazmFQOM0kZpK12QZgjLt9o63RFlM327e4jlnaZlvdsIVLhiUQQ11QR2o4kcwkYASkhMbcnJtehHtthGXvyA3dYBdU6VY2xpMY4OYvRvj/on7e0gVu10hbV0NEmJtu5qxGqYyeiv0B5LfDEG6+dw2jzV1vnPOZ6s6YPOp1Spelx6pyKWY8+U9b4fIu/RtJFYhbTJpIM9XLCVjH6Ox+gZhXGxipIVHqmyD3OEh762nEjRRkRBJvlrGeG5ljbTIMd2c3++UCki5acZnwex4ujQdaexqsQ2JdeenSypPHrh5EjXXckw99rpb7YSumGbg9Nu93Ps6ubYNNL05Nw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(5660300002)(224303003)(86362001)(36756003)(26005)(6916009)(71200400001)(83380400001)(66574015)(186003)(2906002)(4326008)(54906003)(316002)(66476007)(66556008)(53546011)(6506007)(33656002)(66446008)(66946007)(76116006)(91956017)(64756008)(6486002)(8936002)(2616005)(6512007)(966005)(4001150100001)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 56ad4da7-6961-432f-8056-08d87cc2207e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Oct 2020 10:54:08.2496 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FaMI/uwA91+jeBxhc9yZ2tnBfPUThmG+jauAjdyrMSmCAvXrgWc/KyZay5IJQjal
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3586
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/zOwJrE-2XVwDzQKHgAjCpSBM0pc>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:54:15 -0000

Thanks. Looks good.

- Bernie

> On Oct 30, 2020, at 4:18 AM, Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Éric,
> 
> Thank you very much for your review!
> 
> We just submitted revision -12, which aims at addressing the comments
> received from the IESG and related reviewers:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-12
> 
> Please find below our inline responses:
> 
> 
>> Ã?ric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thank you for the work put into this document. It is an important topic
>> and the
>> document is both easy to ready and detailed.
> 
> Thank you for your kind words.
> 
>> Please find below one trivial DISCUSS point and a couple of non-blocking
>> COMMENT points but please also check: - Ines Robles IoT directorate
>> review:
>>        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11-iotdir-telechat-robles-2020-10-20/
>> - Bernie Volz Internet directorate review:
>>        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11-intdir-telechat-volz-2020-10-20/
> 
> Yes, the latest revision is intended to address the comments received on
> -11, including those by Inés and Bernie.
> 
>> I hope that this helps to improve the document,
> 
> It did help, thank you.
> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> -éric
>> 
>> == DISCUSS ==
>> 
>> Please replace all RFC 2460 references to RFC 8200. Trivial to fix ;-)
> 
> Done. ;-)
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> == COMMENTS ==
>> 
>> Should a reference to RFC 8900 be added in the MTU discussion in section
>> 4.1 ?
> 
> A reference to RFC 8900 has been added accordingly.
> 
>> -- Section 2 --
>> As noted by many, the BCP 14 boiler plate is the old one and the normative
>> terminology is not used in this informational document. => remove it ?
> 
> Agreed. We removed Section 2.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carles (on behalf of the authors)
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email