IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Reactive protocol decision process, for the record thoughts

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sat, 16 February 2013 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63DE21F899F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mp7toj4kgRGK for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (we-in-x0234.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3856721F89A6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k14so3660697wer.39 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MMAwwrFzzFKHyaTA0bNfQ5+zJ0b8axoE4BUWWIBzUkQ=; b=rq3Z6IlaxfhzdvUoY6TkNe+dc/Xkb2EUxTfXpJxlf7tcAv+iRbtWtMBUKgz71JiwZW doZ93teEh1ip0GP5qoCFUwZQlrpD1fI+r4hiSN9cBo7HUUbhBdHhOR1++uGqqk5xLHDf OE0sQ+VvbzeGgIv9YSgbHBVSrG4R4J6/e49u6Xni88wFLStfOJHXqVuXv0jUS2tTDGcH QjBrshWvkNCaWJPvaqTna6OSPCkx+Le0rdFCv/hS2a0kE1hERKD+JucsEOx6SAPy++fX QL3HEA+Mo/Drgsx9lAA4aFJDKdP+wIMyd/zu6g2Gf+R9L/a7qLYTlt+dRth/7tm0oGu3 m+yQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.109.102 with SMTP id hr6mr10886028wjb.24.1361045784315; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.101.70 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:16:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC9VuDLmSKsH7vdEnpSdeTdM6=XfZProcjhtNhe0oN7=dA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+-pDCfqSFwQ=FxNRXp_ccqvuzpwnq3Ltsj+gKL5pfYnMAX=Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=bVC9VuDLmSKsH7vdEnpSdeTdM6=XfZProcjhtNhe0oN7=dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:16:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89KtpF02yBu7hVMJVcvohJjKCmcg36QCwU=1eWi7d86=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [manet] Reactive protocol decision process, for the record thoughts
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:16:25 -0000

> Ignoring a document that has multiple interoperable implementations,
> deployments, MIB document, as well a support from at least a dozen
> MANET participants (not only LOADng authors) without giving rational
> was a disappointment for me.

My understanding to the rationale; there was less discussions on the list
related to LOADng, it seems like the draft was done outside IETF and
then brought to the WG without authors replying on list. For the DYMO
there was alot of discussions with replies from authors.

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email