Re: [manet] Discussion of WG charter draft

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AE3C14F68C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwCgtvEiQlcm; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC433C14F6A3; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33e17342ea7so756410f8f.2; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711077435; x=1711682235; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ex7SvAnWRs4MBOHqrilPfsok82okfYfKl0FPlMJaSb8=; b=dmB8E6YfNfCNyG5xlwogL/nUQp1ud1TGoqfE49zpmJ2BBvQ0iyaH0dZOj4MjN99Fbc +PdxEeD5OjraHUK/k7AyX7A286lpqL7X1RIvNlUz3ou+mxSDH/pxNrow9covR1ZjpDzY VpwE/yVKFJTQiiAkwrJV57iESJaJeKyrkjmLXrFCI8NHRJs52k+TwUQTQjfkbOlILYyZ EbfXhdT9IjzfM7WkVOc6hOv33Hii7Fr42E4K6Me7V0Cj6R09bpolidvtsr90U8iT6Hed FfAY8Pqf1pxTL5uB/w9wlJCq0PurCakQXUctabjdwh7mDLx139bChrG1Q4+h97x9gdP+ t0ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711077435; x=1711682235; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ex7SvAnWRs4MBOHqrilPfsok82okfYfKl0FPlMJaSb8=; b=GbLoKZMsFhXucr/WCQyvkjM3evfRdPFww2LgIM/CmaTKpEFePbT2AAb/w1JIlYiB+m Ahf+HCoMwl/XfxqwwyePuSrQpXt2sM63Z6EIZghd2n/COX6MQ7rB3aRmzKbXHipUxU9X nMbpov+jeH4HWMzmFFCwNtiufcjT1NG5XSBCeETfTbwCdec6sqwlZALRD7l3Ef4Cx+5V cM6aHsn3u95myUiIqA8zcQcgRvQ4iOTCrTVs6aFvRnylVo8cxJ1JFOemCpt9p6h0cUt5 seqWnM2T+QI8Ntkt9hNz7XI7/VOW8PkR4w4JZvPDRzmU7y2e7GEcjRCqzVrROwg7Biea +cZA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUkz94DurmMJ9eFc9zYjLgXR921cDJKx9yyhKeWJUvKTPAxRWoDOgoBNTu1HH05mPzbehyQJtbrKZSMjxHKnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/4fULlF74OLXdvkWVA5lFGZr79MNin11mXcLMs9MX6zDMna2g wOFg6rxk7TPTDAwb14caByUBHCR37YJ7/68GSgIUBJMRwCMN0dsnSyyTyyuiq/KVAAaFly04zQC R/flvb06r5bUY2YvY9mMTxa1cN5HsGyE7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGiGVYmibYc+qcyNb3RvHZCKkjlKcs5RJu0JvQR6izqwgnpwqilq5ynl/R7vopr8Ril0VamtQj9AH8xHPQkxoU=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e0c7:0:b0:33d:c5c5:9bc6 with SMTP id m7-20020adfe0c7000000b0033dc5c59bc6mr727688wri.54.1711077434792; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADnDZ8_GCTvAZ5M0g7dTZ4cObZwZGbGrCWd4gcAgMD=k3tOJjw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88=r5kDM3Hz0Ay+0=9GMm_E87xbUZ5WQmRw4-f2wKdFJw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89j4ZSLyKqUGaeaM2HSrEdN-dXFx80grGKQg3E4XUYHJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89j4ZSLyKqUGaeaM2HSrEdN-dXFx80grGKQg3E4XUYHJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:12:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_CFe982wHB19r=sFE3KxwSi7xrT_c1i86onujcL5F4vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group <manet-chairs@ietf.org>, manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af219a0614374254"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/8SNkB1KbH21BWwTbP89VQp22KtE>
Subject: Re: [manet] Discussion of WG charter draft
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 03:17:25 -0000

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:44 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> [...]
> - IMHO there was a change of some of the meeting_re-charter_presentations
> from the WG chairs without discussions of that on the list. So I am not
> sure why was the changes made or why the plan was changed (i.e. removal of
> Babel maintenance).
>
>
Sorry, one point I made it was mistaken regarding this item of Babel, it
was not removed,
but we need to discuss it on the list by both WGs participants, and how we
work together the plan forward.



> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:42 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
> abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> update to my points with Ronald's as from meeting:
>>
>>  - The MANET WG is responsible for the maintenance of OLSRv2 [RFC 7181],
>> NHDP [RFC 6130] and the Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format [RFC5444],
>> and their extensions – Keep, obvious. Potential topics:
>>
>>  ○ Guidance on use of (lesser known) OLSRv2 features to accommodate
>> specific use cases (informational document)
>>  ○ Hybrid proactive / reactive operation based on an OLSRv2 extension
>>  ○ Hybrid proactive / DTN operation based an OLSRv2 extension
>>  ○ Better MPR selection heuristics
>>  ○ Guidance on OLSRv2 restart
>>  ○ RFC 7779 (DAT Metric) to Proposed Standard
>>  ○ RFC 7722 (Multi-Topology Extension to OLSRv2) to Proposed Standard
>>  ○ Others?
>>
>>  - Potential new work items on the revised charter:
>>  ● DLEP Maintenance & Extensions – Obvious
>>  ● Babel Maintenance & Extensions – Obvious
>>
>
I agree with Babel maintenace

Best regards
AB