Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)

Several chairs are reporting spam Erratta in their working groups.  If you see more of these that don’t make any sense no need to address them.
Thanks
Don

From: manet <manet-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Justin Dean
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 10:39 AM
To: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; manet@ietf.org IETF <manet@ietf.org>; T.Clausen@computer.org; rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com; ronald.intvelt@tno.nl; andrew-ietf@liquid.tech; jgs@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)

Ah you are correct as nearly always, I just saw the MANET and NHDP and thought NHDP.  The RFC number didn't seem right but it's been too long.

Justin (not a co-author of 7466)

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:17 AM Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com<mailto:christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>> wrote:
I feel that as a mere author, I can only make suggestions to the RFC editor. But, yes, as suggestions go, it’s quite a strong one.

(Incidentally Justin, I think you’ve got this one confused with another one - this one just has Thomas and I as authors.)

On 28 Apr 2023, at 15:10, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com<mailto:bebemaster@gmail.com>> wrote:

"Suggest" rejecting seems a little too permissive.  Unless there was some issue with the reporting and there is more that just didn't get included it should be rejected.

Justin Dean (also Co-author of this RFC.)

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:04 AM Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com<mailto:christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>> wrote:
There appears to be a problem here. First, there is no Section 7466. Second, the original and corrected texts are the same.

(Also, were this to be an erratum, the notes would be entirely inadequate.)

I suggest rejecting this erratum.

Christopher Dearlove
(Co-author of this RFC.)

> On 28 Apr 2023, at 13:02, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7466,
> "An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7477
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com<mailto:rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com>>
>
> Section: 7466
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 7466
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 7466
>
> Notes
> -----
> Solve the issue
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7466 (draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
> Publication Date    : March 2015
> Author(s)           : C. Dearlove, T. Clausen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
manet@ietf.org<mailto:manet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet