IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)

Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com> Fri, 28 April 2023 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bebemaster@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8152C16B5AE for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-vLjCw-Ogg2 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7BAC16B5AB for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2a7b02615f1so99950581fa.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682692732; x=1685284732; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YAzkKBcTzLkOv1iea6WxFbOycu7t0dPUqfMHNtUGgBY=; b=pFFAKDkkgndmbtDyDpIZ6pKJwOQoDvdTnBd0eh2B9WCKQg8WoxLEp5ElLa7rjZ8bz6 UOGjq7/BgVW6mXz8L+93sTJjZ1qU39criBekf6rodvVvoD9AQCL52nILRIf/oIxOZkMz koLxUjARJE4cRKJ4wB5CRVDLfbDDKGdFNCtS5XABCwD/AgO3WbYbfnj3Y03+efYbhnu9 ZmQaooKOAQa32K9upNNYY2z+Yo2EXBfdmXW3pW0SmAvUSd0jHGgfEbqMxK/4b6bOxBQm +yl+2T32yj/TVLsmXfgxmMTz5oV8QrQyLiDhRP6Uh01OR2GTCobuEFgeRmP/5tu+q7Ga ic8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682692732; x=1685284732; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YAzkKBcTzLkOv1iea6WxFbOycu7t0dPUqfMHNtUGgBY=; b=jhMDLiJlOLQR6H3nBMfpc+dYp/mSazbPm9DAI9Mg2ICe4unyzqhHZSeIBL+dTo9+Nj se3VsKtWLA2sNv1S7dkTmMj7Woy0HntqFHM/GdyM2s9XPPY6gEMb9nI3QhWCl00BLzDo T2E8+m6GRWM01MX3XJOSBmbNlqn54/CKMlugRyADquphNZjaau8BAbkbEjOf2xN6d7BM IfnIKoDFeaI0/1WfNK922+GQ/jsae27BI4jgGKhhkmmKNwudnFqoF3kqLL3hcYNE3KnH 5R45E9PRw6C/A+POxdJg3loHZYbvVhWHrUM5/MyTXgeioBuzwEvMvVrBRajWP5Q960Ji ZVvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyuKUBykGGTKxX5jejKWVW1Ukgx1RHsX56C76IhVYpRJ2B4FNoL t+PYSd+fuy16GqOH1vl0y5DcZcAtxWGwXeeDOJEiob7v3M8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7xTQgNZ7C3p3papc2dm6u+j+cGqLiyMDfCXYPBa94dB6UByYh976cmS/slgdEOoErXyFI4+DvFDVNEIWMqpGM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:808a:0:b0:2a7:9884:ad53 with SMTP id i10-20020a2e808a000000b002a79884ad53mr1635913ljg.48.1682692732185; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230428120229.2CD1A55D5E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <6A3011F2-D55B-40E3-9156-A5DCEF5A763F@gmail.com> <CA+-pDCdO=YmS_fbzziNj5F5XeMSdT697umREnwxa1aHj3k5wkA@mail.gmail.com> <D0522646-3C68-43D0-80E6-C137D610199E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0522646-3C68-43D0-80E6-C137D610199E@gmail.com>
From: Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:38:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+-pDCe19yjsHBo7qgnx9Cm2LQVqcs7qzWo=1Nd6D8pyNZp4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "manet@ietf.org IETF" <manet@ietf.org>, T.Clausen@computer.org, rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com, ronald.intvelt@tno.nl, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, jgs@juniper.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009170fe05fa666e5e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/PRtunWelw4DQos5NL-AKD7FMYhw>
Subject: Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:38:57 -0000

Ah you are correct as nearly always, I just saw the MANET and NHDP and
thought NHDP.  The RFC number didn't seem right but it's been too long.

Justin (not a co-author of 7466)

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:17 AM Christopher Dearlove <
christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel that as a mere author, I can only make suggestions to the RFC
> editor. But, yes, as suggestions go, it’s quite a strong one.
>
> (Incidentally Justin, I think you’ve got this one confused with another
> one - this one just has Thomas and I as authors.)
>
> On 28 Apr 2023, at 15:10, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Suggest" rejecting seems a little too permissive.  Unless there was some
> issue with the reporting and there is more that just didn't get included it
> should be rejected.
>
> Justin Dean (also Co-author of this RFC.)
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:04 AM Christopher Dearlove <
> christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There appears to be a problem here. First, there is no Section 7466.
>> Second, the original and corrected texts are the same.
>>
>> (Also, were this to be an erratum, the notes would be entirely
>> inadequate.)
>>
>> I suggest rejecting this erratum.
>>
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> (Co-author of this RFC.)
>>
>> > On 28 Apr 2023, at 13:02, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7466,
>> > "An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood
>> Discovery Protocol (NHDP)".
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > You may review the report below and at:
>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7477
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > Type: Technical
>> > Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Section: 7466
>> >
>> > Original Text
>> > -------------
>> > 7466
>> >
>> > Corrected Text
>> > --------------
>> > 7466
>> >
>> > Notes
>> > -----
>> > Solve the issue
>> >
>> > Instructions:
>> > -------------
>> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > RFC7466 (draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-04)
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > Title               : An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network
>> (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
>> > Publication Date    : March 2015
>> > Author(s)           : C. Dearlove, T. Clausen
>> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> > Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
>> > Area                : Routing
>> > Stream              : IETF
>> > Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email