Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)

Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> Fri, 28 April 2023 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59B7C16B5AD for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mkPcLaXdW5_n for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A474C169530 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5083bd8e226so15240930a12.3 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682691451; x=1685283451; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XntCUrtLjei6Mour1OIg14Z/LlU4nH/WxbeUV8tW4v4=; b=JViah25qM6/rZWcGQh/h8uiEaGpDZsI2hfE/ivSeff1XdnF+DWS60PTQ7TEhrd2aHs Mq38qqvqfQovtbApsmHD7nsQhM0clyvwDLaUicpdnfFrQ0EuJjogVDH9sgjSknqphINc Yj+zXRB7ltbdcNIz+K8VWufQsufR1Li2lNFrkQYpwjUV15zEe7cGDIIq9IuGzF0DFf2a 9s+w1u7yoL07ayJ1qW5QQq2b166whwI20qmhYicIs9ayeX74foZWD7dOXZNwK1r6mTXc ctpkVLiRdJN3VwkZxLG+xeGZf8vSWTpKkHVIy4CUk1fDdNOvfgxt3Pv2jjgaP7w1Cflb FAXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682691451; x=1685283451; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XntCUrtLjei6Mour1OIg14Z/LlU4nH/WxbeUV8tW4v4=; b=b8yvEb0Ups6AjM5MttrLwL5d1KpECr6HV4EY/ywhTAGjaZhDmRTWxJFj8eInCYJ1Fh dTKkdP33z6dGLkrBtgt1opAA6ABwkxV0d4RpkXW6/F9NrebyAmqfYlvG5tFs/MZwIBob hxS+Vj1vdoexi1SjEi5t/VLWN6q3CS18qRgSjOs5Z7TWWBFTrpWo2n9+eAoM0n2TUKUy Mca6lPsS0wQRTYlAg4BiRQU8p29sRFdHbaO6lR9NR5k8PfwmtjDAeMpcMQQefr8sbmI9 E4Otcb5HiF+PDEjJl/Zz+lCotsX7TTdwE1wdGly1h5hGgbYVQ6jCJJXPzb+LEj19JNqw fbog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwTUAmn2aDTrEgB26EMlF2dD8Uh+y5/qUUbodiR2WiR/p0eeW9P xZVrZoucWd8fYcbCvXZDREw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5JY8swEyU9WNUjVBvjRK8I+TyPCN96/90mTiHYqf4AWeqvdO/XdDHW0OFhVjijgk1Cm6Pb+g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fd8b:b0:94f:32ed:637e with SMTP id xa11-20020a170906fd8b00b0094f32ed637emr5128399ejb.59.1682691451280; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (82-132-227-226.dab.02.net. [82.132.227.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qw35-20020a1709066a2300b0095ef7268ba9sm3968702ejc.41.2023.04.28.07.17.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Apr 2023 07:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D0522646-3C68-43D0-80E6-C137D610199E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_15400350-5ADE-43E0-8955-03CB4660B936"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:17:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CA+-pDCdO=YmS_fbzziNj5F5XeMSdT697umREnwxa1aHj3k5wkA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "manet@ietf.org IETF" <manet@ietf.org>, T.Clausen@computer.org, rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com, ronald.intvelt@tno.nl, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, jgs@juniper.net
To: Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>
References: <20230428120229.2CD1A55D5E@rfcpa.amsl.com> <6A3011F2-D55B-40E3-9156-A5DCEF5A763F@gmail.com> <CA+-pDCdO=YmS_fbzziNj5F5XeMSdT697umREnwxa1aHj3k5wkA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/EDU_Eqwf_bCg1CHGcPzZjNosQS8>
Subject: Re: [manet] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7466 (7477)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:17:36 -0000

I feel that as a mere author, I can only make suggestions to the RFC editor. But, yes, as suggestions go, it’s quite a strong one.

(Incidentally Justin, I think you’ve got this one confused with another one - this one just has Thomas and I as authors.)

> On 28 Apr 2023, at 15:10, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> "Suggest" rejecting seems a little too permissive.  Unless there was some issue with the reporting and there is more that just didn't get included it should be rejected.
> 
> Justin Dean (also Co-author of this RFC.)
> 
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:04 AM Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com <mailto:christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> There appears to be a problem here. First, there is no Section 7466. Second, the original and corrected texts are the same.
>> 
>> (Also, were this to be an erratum, the notes would be entirely inadequate.)
>> 
>> I suggest rejecting this erratum.
>> 
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> (Co-author of this RFC.)
>> 
>> > On 28 Apr 2023, at 13:02, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7466,
>> > "An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)".
>> > 
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > You may review the report below and at:
>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7477
>> > 
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > Type: Technical
>> > Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com <mailto:rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com>>
>> > 
>> > Section: 7466
>> > 
>> > Original Text
>> > -------------
>> > 7466
>> > 
>> > Corrected Text
>> > --------------
>> > 7466
>> > 
>> > Notes
>> > -----
>> > Solve the issue
>> > 
>> > Instructions:
>> > -------------
>> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> > 
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > RFC7466 (draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-04)
>> > --------------------------------------
>> > Title               : An Optimization for the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
>> > Publication Date    : March 2015
>> > Author(s)           : C. Dearlove, T. Clausen
>> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> > Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
>> > Area                : Routing
>> > Stream              : IETF
>> > Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet