Re: [manet] Request to update MANET-WG-Milestones

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F15321F866D for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SOzTG6gh206O for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5138621F866B for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so7280863vbb.31 for <manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E/oiU8nxGGMxjFGKx64sZToKqz6dWFxn1FPuamJFx1o=; b=cxfloGdP534JMfZmpZ1e58aMrncX2oHKk+qVGGnfjWmtp562Z2kDu9IuO9ZAn10VH3 Oaa+MoHldI3/hQ4OCFntlPEqfe6RkRAYk3T8K4Jfw3FQ39OAox4ebsHM9dUyzm5rCNOd Lnp8Mf8jqsg58ybXP63mOiUwZU4kirrHvLKVdXozQp38ob4oUqhgIUy+dP2P/25vO/p2 SfCsF/rCWyyAO/r9ibdhYpxIaGyiuPuvInDHL6w3r+Y03qhn3vP4NKo41Da4djezOwKQ piU/0GuPV0+q/fmmbgCPF0TZC3sGP8buJkMyIbBkwyEDG2Yoc/AHexs70c2sQnOEhkZq yvUQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.204.212 with SMTP id fn20mr16204296vcb.43.1343808747770; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.141.200 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-ArnYio0V+EWY0u3nadx+rOuD=k4YVBRyKtbD0TcH+ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8-ArnYio0V+EWY0u3nadx+rOuD=k4YVBRyKtbD0TcH+ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:12:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_mbgKcE_gDSOc97tK=VcLAKSpv+4ZAcWjvmFKi4NSX5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [manet] Request to update MANET-WG-Milestones
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:12:29 -0000

It is good to know that there will be an update to the Milestones as
per AD request in July or this request thread request in June.
However, does the WG want to amend the charter as well, not sure, but
for me I have no ideas, hoping others to decide if needed.

AB
=====
On 6/20/12, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> As copied below from 2012-06-13-Charter, checking the milestones of
> MANET WG, please update the NHDP and SMF works are already [Done], but
> not amended,
>
> DLEP work does not appear as milestone, please add,
>
> AB
> ============================
> Goals and Milestones:
>
>   Done     - Post as an informational Internet-Drafts a discussion of
> mobile ad-hoc
>                  networking and issues.
>   Done     - Agenda bashing, discussion of charter and of mobile ad
> hoc networking
>                  draft.
>   Done     - Discuss proposed protocols and issues. Redefine charter.
>   Done     - Publish Informational RFC on manet design considerations
>   Done     - Review the WG Charter and update
>   Done     - Submit AODV specification to IESG for publication as
> Experimental RFC
>   Done     - Develop I-D for potential common manet encapsulation
> protocol approach
>   Done     - Submit initial I-D(s) of candidate proposed routing
> protocols and design
>                  frameworks
>   Done     - Promote implementation, revision, and testing of initial
> proposed I-D(s)
>   Done     - Explore basic performance and implementation issues of initial
>                  approaches
>   Done     - Explore proposed proactive protocol design commonalities
>   Done     - Submit DSR specification to IESG for publication as
> Experimental RFC
>   Done     - Submit OLSR specification to IESG for publication as
> Experimental RFC
>   Done     - Submit TBRPF specification to IESG for publication as
> Experimental
>                  RFC
>   Done     - Develop a further focused problem statement and address an
> approach
>                  for a common engineering work effort
>   Done     - Reevaluate the WG's potential based on the problem statement
>                  consensus
>   Done     - Submit initial ID of RMP for WG review
>   Done     - Submit initial ID of PMP for WG review
>   Done     - Submit inital ID of generalized MANET flooding approach
>   Done     - Revise WG documents and review
>   Done     - Document initial implementation progress and experience Revise
>                 documents based upon implementation experience
>   Done     - Submit initial WG ID on Neighborhood Discovery (NHDP)
>   Done     - Submit PacketBB to IESG
>   Done     - Submit initial WG ID on MIB for NHDP, DYMO, OLSRv2
>   Apr 2007 - Submit NHDP to IESG
>   Apr 2007 - Submit DYMO to IESG
>   Apr 2007 - Submit OLSRv2 to IESG
>   Apr 2007 - Submit SMF to IESG
> =======================================
>