[manet] Request to update MANET-WG-Milestones

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 14 September 2014 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0811A00A8 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QIwYWqjpR0m for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF5F1A00BA for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 79so1557069ykr.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wevspWfTv6fQg2pmq9LyNGNviCazJuvh5Wk+wvzz/hQ=; b=woSQsMbufXdHsuxPtwDSb1IxJeO5BHtNGFQo3xbCIHwewLc0BzucSn6P71hleSe4nM oTalB5rjyh3OZ7Y8vIU4bl0qTJ3XnVFrQ9gZPpWmHg/BTzYaGenMx5pe8BIRgtr9mmf8 dJELW82xEKtN15uk60zHEb8gnDFPJP9R7DogPg1W5EHN0Uy/FKNHcq258qLMbExYYhnc DD0rvWgJNXkLnYzVDsnWi/+mVoIM/6vd8M7ofn09n2pXxK0/OlU66rrpCJ6g2c9p2+Q7 zI96l1FX0YlNXULPxVI++3PQIfHLkcNzeq/+sseDO1ipS6Usx56q2Dgw2QOpaOhUaHR4 GHeg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.140.11 with SMTP id d11mr26738784yhj.16.1410712352370; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.86.196 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89CbBO8zxCRP0kMw8gHFvvXaUR57PnS5hAzhEB-XuGyFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8-ArnYio0V+EWY0u3nadx+rOuD=k4YVBRyKtbD0TcH+ew@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_mbgKcE_gDSOc97tK=VcLAKSpv+4ZAcWjvmFKi4NSX5g@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89CbBO8zxCRP0kMw8gHFvvXaUR57PnS5hAzhEB-XuGyFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:32:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ89s34PNzceVFOTLg6U+Eiwsf2E=bLRCwYTS0D-921o8Og@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303ea3e4a4ce940503091083"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/9qU4aLvoMzPSke5r9zk7r9vNY94
Cc: "manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <manet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [manet] Request to update MANET-WG-Milestones
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:32:36 -0000

Please update the WG milestone for WG drafts listed below, with
reasonable dates. Most of them need to be added because the WG adopted them
(I may forgotten some because of the volume). For AODVv2 and DLEP the date
past.

draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2
draft-ietf-manet-dlep
draft-ietf-manet-report-mib

draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology
draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath

draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis
draft-ietf-manet-smf-sec-threats

It is important for me to see the milestones so I can progress. Please note
that my reviews/participation depend on WG milestones not on WG calls (IMHO
the WG calls should consider milestones to help guid participation).
Thanking you.


AB