IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12: (with COMMENT)

Jiazi Yi <ietf@jiaziyi.com> Wed, 10 May 2017 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@jiaziyi.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C855E1252BA; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jiaziyi.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSa-A2peWABC; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sender-of-o52.zoho.com (sender-of-o52.zoho.com [135.84.80.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377191200C1; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1494408581; s=jiazi; d=jiaziyi.com; i=ietf@jiaziyi.com; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; l=1007; bh=zpmZFOTs/aG75hqfLdtMYd8bkkyyUhC3auDkqGQxO1o=; b=quVucy/tlQTsjG7429zxzafCmKD/fnM6LmumtuZV6SFjdTLfqaLJKCT8WowDxbTz VnhR9Ldf8mRTPcdfutMzMoGuSXzLinD1ZyJvKHmC+pOUZ3fTXsWTP2ZbXbleg0mZVjd DihW7H1gOuz1UFbMcDNNE/EBco8lMOdN+dkSwx0w=
Received: from [129.104.72.106] (129.104.72.106 [129.104.72.106]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1494408581302942.0830710335102; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jiazi Yi <ietf@jiaziyi.com>
In-Reply-To: <149438454593.28420.3155308625575149497.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 11:29:43 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, manet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath@ietf.org, manet-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A715A18-8D1D-4759-8AD9-4CC2A8D238EB@jiaziyi.com>
References: <149438454593.28420.3155308625575149497.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-ZohoMailClient: External
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/NRyn7dXSk-r5Z6mEL2-DBkrisTo>
Subject: Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 09:29:47 -0000

Dear Suresh, 

Thanks very much for the comments. 
Alvaro raised the same issue before — we will use the type 3 header in the next revision. 

best

Jiazi


> On 10 May 2017, at 04:49, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12: No Objection
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I find it really strange that this document uses an experimental Routing
> header type codepoint (254) but requires the processing to be same as the
> RPL Routing header (Type 3). Is there a reason things are done this way
> instead of just using the Type 3 header as is?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email