[manet] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I find it really strange that this document uses an experimental Routing
header type codepoint (254) but requires the processing to be same as the
RPL Routing header (Type 3). Is there a reason things are done this way
instead of just using the Type 3 header as is?