Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5497 (1724)

"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com> Mon, 16 March 2009 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFE328C153 for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.682
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1GwvxsWnYL5 for <manet@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.bae.co.uk (smtp1.bae.co.uk [20.133.0.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3A428C151 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpb.greenlnk.net (smtpb.greenlnk.net [10.15.160.219]) by smtp1.bae.co.uk (Switch-3.1.10/Switch-3.1.10) with ESMTP id n2GAWS8N016451 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:28 GMT
Received: from glkas0002.GREENLNK.NET (glkas0002.greenlnk.net [10.15.184.52]) by smtpb.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.9) with ESMTP id n2GAWSsB020252 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:28 GMT
Received: from glkms1101.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.109]) by glkas0002.GREENLNK.NET with InterScan Message Security Suite; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:28 -0000
Received: from GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.93]) by glkms1101.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:28 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:27 -0000
Message-ID: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01ABF655@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <200903161016.n2GAGQGZ014992@boreas.isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5497 (1724)
Thread-Index: AcmmIJWujLIroCwsSYq9pPxMfgmJIQAAK0wg
References: <200903161016.n2GAGQGZ014992@boreas.isi.edu>
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, T.Clausen@computer.org, rcallon@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, macker@itd.nrl.navy.mil, ian.chakeres@gmail.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2009 10:32:28.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[811A1980:01C9A622]
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5497 (1724)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:31:52 -0000

This erratum does point out an error, but the correction is
itself incorrect.

The references to Section 5 should be to Section 6. They
should however NOT be to Section 6.2. There are two forms
of Time TLV, both defined in Section 6, one in Section 6.1
and one defined in Section 6.2. To make this reference to
Section 6.2 would imply that these TLVs would have to be
of one form only, which is definitely not the case.
Furthermore part of the specification is in Section 6
before Section 6.1. and that should also be covered by
the reference,

I have not yet seen erratum 1723, but in the indicated
sections, two reference to Section 5 should also be to
Section 6 (not Section 6.1 - although Section 6.1 rather
than Section 6.2 applies, Section 6 before Section 6.1
also should be included in the cross-reference).

The erratum here should be


Original Text
-------------
a) Section 8.1, last paragraph

   An INTERVAL_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 5.

b) Section 8.2, last paragraph

   A VALIDITY_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 5.


Corrected Text
--------------
a)

   An INTERVAL_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 6.

b)

   A VALIDITY_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 6.


Christopher Dearlove (co-author of RFC 5497)

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Technology Leader, Communications Group
Networks, Security and Information Systems Department
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Sent: 16 March 2009 10:16
To: T.Clausen@computer.org; Dearlove, Christopher (UK);
rcallon@juniper.net; dward@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;
macker@itd.nrl.navy.mil; ian.chakeres@gmail.com
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de; manet@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5497 (1724)


               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5497,
"Representing Multi-Value Time in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5497&eid=1724

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Section: 8.1 and 8.2

Original Text
-------------
a) Section 8.1, last paragraph

   An INTERVAL_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 5.

b) Section 8.2, last paragraph

   A VALIDITY_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 5.


Corrected Text
--------------
a)

   An INTERVAL_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 6.2.

b)

   A VALIDITY_TIME TLV is an example of a Time TLV specified as in
|  Section 6.2.


Notes
-----
Rationale:
Section 5 only contains the low-level details;
Section 6, and in particular Section 6.2, contains the precise
specification of the Time TLV format used in Sections 8.1 and 8.2. 

See Errata ID #1723 for similar issues in Sections 7.1 and 7.2.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5497 (draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Representing Multi-Value Time in Mobile Ad Hoc
Networks (MANETs)
Publication Date    : March 2009
Author(s)           : T. Clausen, C. Dearlove
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************