Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102

Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> Thu, 12 July 2018 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB549130EF4 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 05:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YjXq4OuNdpdf for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 05:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com (mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com [188.94.42.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0B7130DDE for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::753b:fa82:5c0:af0d]) by tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::753b:fa82:5c0:af0d%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:29:13 +0100
From: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: "hrogge@gmail.com" <hrogge@gmail.com>, "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
CC: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102
Thread-Index: AQHUGJWsOjxeb9dA+Ee80X7vinMNyKSLWPCAgAAc9oA=
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:29:12 +0000
Message-ID: <fb55c778646bd5648a64e80a46af966220a47f8a.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
References: <0b369e1f-ca7b-54fb-b473-610fef95630f@labn.net> <CAGnRvupKZoi=J8opsPbbsNMa66U9jmS-N6=zf9t5_TFBBM-bbA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvupKZoi=J8opsPbbsNMa66U9jmS-N6=zf9t5_TFBBM-bbA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:470:1f09:a1a::1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3DF27CE5AE542F4597667ACF6522C03B@home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/XH8c54DqHu1K2M6xL_hlFtFl7Xw>
Subject: Re: [manet] DLEP discussions @ IETF102
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:29:40 -0000

Hi Henning,

I too have been looking at this.  I imagine what's needed a new queue
implementation for the tc subsystem that implements token bucket with a
netlink API to user-mode to allow it to be topped up from time to time.

However, it's a bit of work that I have yet to have time to implement.

We would be happy to collaborate on getting patches into the kernel to
support.

Cheers,

Rick

On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:45 +0200, Henning Rogge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wonder if someone has found a good way to implement the router flow
> control part (in Linux) without using the "Pause" mechanism (which is
> normally a pretty crude thing to use)...
> 
> Most traffic classes don't allow setting absolute amounts of bytes
> that are allowed to be transmitted.
> 
> Henning
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:33 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Just as a heads up - We plan to present a couple of DLEP topics in
> > CCAMP
> > next week.
> > 
> > The interesting part is the credit based flow control draft
> > reorganization and request for adoption call on IEEE 802.1Q Aware
> > Credit
> > Window Extension draft (draft-berger-manet-dlep-ether-credit-
> > extension)
> > -- I still have no idea which WG would do such an adoption call
> > (MANET
> > or CCAMP...)
> > 
> > The less interesting part is a brief update on our DLEP extensions
> > that
> > are post LC:
> > 
> >      DLEP Latency Range Extension
> >      draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-03
> >      DLEP Multi-Hop Forwarding Extension
> >      draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-05
> >      DLEP Control Plane Based Pause Extension <-- which had a 1 LC
> > related change discussed on the list
> >      draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-04
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Lou (and co-authors)
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > manet mailing list
> > manet@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet