IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] ready for LC : latency and multi-hop

Victoria Pritchard <pritchardv0@gmail.com> Sun, 21 January 2018 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <pritchardv0@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CB7126D73 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZZunJttw4GO for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7A112426E for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b77so7422622itd.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TPwGE6/dLeDBPR2+NtNgkrvTdDNKV0YQKNC83k9nYh4=; b=FTnWi68lbCiBPTbrQ/UMr0HAH/UrerS7bP9BCrMfaEoIBNc6FWPkZ83mIjsnFrNdu8 PiWlrM1FubpmJS/EuDiyCez3PG7AGOUOWffIdraq3gDOGEfnWsRG0XW5sbqHU4u1XQfb L7503q9qBSZQK6zGpCgWXhEfFuFJ6Icetb26eKloPpTlZMrCAhJO+94pQ40Dw1jtA+i0 PB/vQlgETKpNUZaFvQmlhGPDiUIkv/MDFUULS3Wv2v3vJt1GoxQOCGye0FQR8+uVj0Z1 vvrbTCqGZzsW8/9zIkruu5DVw0Fujvk9KPNcElPW/h3RYXFDz6FlzjGw5gU1hPZFrU21 1Zaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TPwGE6/dLeDBPR2+NtNgkrvTdDNKV0YQKNC83k9nYh4=; b=bjRij6sGOe6+MAQDfEs2bbxefFib/IcDMCT3gdSjdc0l9XGkzpywmvlBR4ZDs/pN3X DRppNNwNlIjFA3HtcOy1nkVD74JbJFGFy+meCi+VwKvl97KadmkYlMsgn7J+qI9znNt3 cN9exPMsUDq4MGZ343LmxiVWA8heQzXZVNbLuUN3GJGJxhEaMBBX2F5adLUpVK3sumLB cY2RyfWG1zAG4kJhgMwJ3KPW2u2soga+w9pLRVh/qxI3xl24EEuEevDuGw1Q8T/oIySq IumOJJIo+uf60l4SZxKkRSqgCBInFCqYeWyCBwDjEL5MP/CtZ6MZaa6ebL4KlZel3ybi gb1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcsBWjtJ2SKmgBxezcAT9ukeTIJO2Q+SNnBX435AA3T0kXN113F pzYfKHbPeCQ0AUIWRfLQFBW0MvkIIp4K1zio39g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2262gUAA6tzWZQop3HdMv89p7OE66OTm3Q2JVeUDD9qVkxxxa1qoJkUhxb2dMLHyfenInlTEnlEgeTA0d+mzd8g=
X-Received: by 10.36.83.1 with SMTP id n1mr5392276itb.96.1516557823875; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.61.10 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:03:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+-pDCdLfTB7RsopqttYh243JeJ0kst3EPsJPuyXhPs4C3vR2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <151182163087.13335.9898030294539351604@ietfa.amsl.com> <f9b818ce-f032-e04f-c6e4-8f3e14fe1793@labn.net> <CA+-pDCdLfTB7RsopqttYh243JeJ0kst3EPsJPuyXhPs4C3vR2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victoria Pritchard <pritchardv0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:03:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+fLEhKsyMLfYzGaO5ip9T8mavjyuLeDi2=G942iLpMH6SY=NA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144938c5f9e0705634d229f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/YEeWE_wGxtjTy-SMAOjv4dxPQGE>
Subject: Re: [manet] ready for LC : latency and multi-hop
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:03:47 -0000

Hi all,

Just a few picky comments on the Latency Range draft.

Title
Lantency -> Latency

Abstract
Should you reference the DLEP RFC number here? Or at least expand the
acronym?

Section 1
It's "Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol" (not "Event Protocol")

"provides an average latency" - the definition in RFC8175 actually says
"The calculation
   of latency is implementation dependent.  For example, the latency may
   be a running average calculated from the internal queuing." so not sure
it's right to say it provides an average.

"one new DLEP
   Data Items" - unnecessary 's' on Items

Section 3
Is it " Latency Range Item " or " Latency Range Data Item "? Makes sense to
be consistent

Under the Maximum Latency field description:
"representing the transmission longest
      delay"
should that be "longest transmission delay"?
Similar comment for Minimum Latency

Section 5.2
"Data Item Type Values"  is the name of the registry in RFC8175.


Regards,
Vicky

On 8 January 2018 at 21:46, Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com> wrote:

> As discussed during IETF 100 these documents are now in last call. Please
> review them and post comments to the list.
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-latency-extension-01
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-03
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email