Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding section for packets
Jiazi YI <ietf@jiaziyi.com> Fri, 19 September 2014 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <yi.jiazi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DD51A86ED for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0F0rYwZUPTp for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CA51A0697 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z2so130411wiv.5 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NTSAj9vY+01YOKDC1H8U/FdhhJbiYSIeDPlK9606sVQ=; b=dWA6XmGuy3YnHPon1M2bPy013dyF8oHSkEmTW3iTKTAd0KGWfst4pj2HCHrV/t0Ldp kezxkTiZq+00QYSfEWkhxZPuVW+1RhfmrvYOXVjzBHrzdZ6rcgg8maDIYVJZY7xbntx+ 7i55aX1S2miyB5NciqSRqsV33WlJ07DQScbDvV4oFEA51s2druXwcrZ7qMsjA0EFR0Mi ZMIrZY0/Go28YM7CDZH2HsfV2wFOmQ7TcRdBjZ7nBKsPIR9PkXEpSG4UOYu4TVhPZO74 ALn1ZbuRSEdHCQGhbprCOPk4pm2y7slGYNuhiczp8x+tt0i/0+JDPcTeWvAGwFDlwVPe 1XhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.136 with SMTP id b8mr3137771wjx.106.1411155643170; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: yi.jiazi@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.176.226 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_WKV6V-1rcgDjWw=U_+5LksfTk8pSvOnOZbGJ4qN17pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8-Wv7oNr3KYfFEW-4zsij9WPUd9dE4m-uv5ZXUNh5Gz6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGnRvup=5NRJOZ6pKQn0_p+4mT7LUF3zBe6oJtHPFGGyH3AsQw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_WKV6V-1rcgDjWw=U_+5LksfTk8pSvOnOZbGJ4qN17pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 21:40:43 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zS19LRxFu8jN5TZTgAtCMD9Ucy8
Message-ID: <CAN1bDFycdDUW9oPEOc6yGQKk3uPXLbaHc7Fye_hSOY3ZMjxYfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jiazi YI <ietf@jiaziyi.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd91a8cd585a9050370469f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/ZHRsGfAUer7qixuEsyjzSkRXGio
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding section for packets
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:40:46 -0000
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Abdussalam Baryun < abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Henning, > > On Thursday, September 18, 2014, Henning Rogge wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >> I don't think the MT-OLSRv2 draft restricts the mechanism described in >> section 13.2 of RFC 7181 in any way. It only defines extensions of the >> existing TC messages. It does not even change any part of the flooding >> process, including the flooding MPR set. > > > I think it should do, to ensure (with its conditions) that any packet > have combine messages of only same topology. RFC7181 section 13.2 does not > ensure that because it is not MT protocol. So it will be good to refer to > that in one section in this draft of MT. > No. There is nothing special regarding this point that needs to be added. best Jiazi
- [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding secti… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Jiazi YI
- [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding secti… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AB#2 (olsrv2-multitopology): Adding s… Christopher Dearlove