[manet] DLEP required metrics
"Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL" <David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu> Thu, 03 May 2018 21:33 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=866160ec7d=david.wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC312EB3A for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2ge39Rr1SSb for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from llmx3.ll.mit.edu (LLMX3.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E8A12EAE6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 14:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local) by llmx3.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id w43LXfCU021697 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:33:41 -0400
From: "Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL" <David.Wiggins@ll.mit.edu>
To: manet <manet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DLEP required metrics
Thread-Index: AQHT4yZnsWCUj9aGlUSYxuw+0XqjvA==
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 21:33:40 +0000
Message-ID: <E95E649D-7618-4705-8611-A1C8EF2DD8FD@ll.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.25.59.118]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3608213620_1725792579"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-03_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=879 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805030185
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/_jhWmELXb_TKUgWlad7iDWP0Vvc>
Subject: [manet] DLEP required metrics
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 21:33:48 -0000
In RFC 8175, the following metrics are required in a Session Initialization Response: Maximum Data Rate (Receive) Maximum Data Rate (Transmit) Current Data Rate (Receive) Current Data Rate (Transmit) Latency If a modem doesn’t have a value for one or more of these metrics, what value should it use? Ideally it would just omit the metric, but with the current RFC, that isn’t an option. Note that these same metrics are optional in Destination Up and Update. David
- [manet] DLEP required metrics Wiggins, David - 0665 - MITLL
- Re: [manet] DLEP required metrics Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] DLEP required metrics Rick Taylor