[manet] AD review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 20 October 2014 11:32 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090EE1A86E6 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtcTpFMnsfuV for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4D31A86EF for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9KBWX8D026129; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:32:33 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (jplon-nat14.juniper.net [193.110.55.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9KBWUZQ026091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:32:32 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization.all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:32:31 +0100
Message-ID: <00ae01cfec59$8ab50f80$a01f2e80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac/sWYGyCeDzI9qNSQG+4QZ1jVAWCA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21038.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.250-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.250-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 7pXUPg156/qnykMun0J1wnBRIrj8R47F7yWPaQc4INRBTdeoy0R9D9j3 ZmXrgmMg/dE5KSORodpl676AYmtnBiKGOGUxO74csy5zTeFbONsuUQAX7gy0DFum/6Bx84ArjdA O270xgYlZyevcNikRfgqZQ38oK2SslVIFRFMViNCeAiCmPx4NwLTrdaH1ZWqCmBlD3TjdXl76C0 ePs7A07Y6HM5rqDwqtbXFUFG1EGTWQLqeCcKw8qSax5zPG0iyXjeoeE43uJZAeo4DYK6vZhg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/hdVFNOiADuLw0wPQbScO3G-JRK4
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: [manet] AD review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:32:44 -0000
Authors, Thanks for this document. I have done my AD review and have nothing to add except to note that your work probably makes a slight security improvement by making the 2-hop neighbor relations more resilient to short-term quality attacks (such as radio interference) on links. You could add that to the Security Considerations section, but there is no need to hold up the document while you think about that. I will start the IETF last call. Adrian
- [manet] AD review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimi… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [manet] AD review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-op… Thomas Clausen
- Re: [manet] AD review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-op… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)