IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology and draft-dearlove-manet-tlv-naming-00.txt

Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Fri, 21 November 2014 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ABD1A6F3F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:02:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZT32Fbe408V for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF181A6FCF for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id q1so4791328lam.39 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:00:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=06f43cP+m/oj+I+qNAU4Q2quCSX/YUExP/EB3UxRA1w=; b=lY3qjS489ce7HcBKmz6qLEiYPDJc3/JktYlpxF8apo5BHDv2xS+PDg/u8y1VbyjdE+ 4tPdoIP1a/TMn2gGzmuPajs9py47wdJ/hFzAAhjb4tRsZt0nOMHeqHrnPb1p5SbYN23H HW4ZP0pgSBWkQPx0aX6bXPfuVj+2M5OvBa3z/mx9neIgV8m8VC7RSGAHuPt3yUJ0sB8q MphrWfxsjkxrsthO++8MbK39bHfDvutkQeuWu+yM7QlbLi3psfxzoNmTuv/wPr59VXdb mOnU6pK65GbNfEHiwoFFtWqviOJWA1WP0McteiGnKGKrDY7hHlqbvLFQ46Dpk2C3MA1Z jIdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.63.133 with SMTP id g5mr7319772lbs.33.1416600040248; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.85.201 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:00:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_Psa9eg2pJiSJ+bygrbjzOscqCFmyDv0FAF6Bu9T=s6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141111005114.27018.49670.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B96A7F1C-E508-44A2-BEDA-F09A9CF17783@thomasclausen.org> <CADnDZ8_Psa9eg2pJiSJ+bygrbjzOscqCFmyDv0FAF6Bu9T=s6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:00:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyo=oy9otsHKyCqmwwnc=hCG=C+FvO730mrr+o41cD_UPcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3d830301ef4050863e602"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/keU7NlSoLTBdHhUljPUAsuwqmXs
Cc: manet <manet@ietf.org>, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology and draft-dearlove-manet-tlv-naming-00.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:02:44 -0000

AB,

I don't believe the WG has been excluded, primarily because there is an I-D
posted for the WG's consideration and approval.

Regards,
Stan

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I don't know why we have to move things fast. Moving things fast adds
> possible errors, and may confuse the community. We need to consider
> that participants need to give a decision on when to move things fast
> and when not to move things fast. I don't agree to move this draft
> fast nor agreed to move the multitopology draft fast. We could have
> done fast process if the draft was discussed before published, so that
> the WG can decide if fast is required. Just my opinion how things go
> fast in organisation that involve all.
>
> On 11/10/14, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> wrote:
> > Since, of course, all y’all are compulsively reading the ID-announce
> mailing
> > list ;) you’ll have seen draft-dearlove-manet-tlv-naming-00.txt document
> > appear just today.
> >
> > This is in response to the review from our AD on
> > draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multitopology
> > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg16875.html
> > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg16875.html>), in
> > which he indicates that we probably should re-think the way we name TLV
> > types.
> >
> > As our AD requested, the authors did re-think, discuss a bit also with
> our
> > AD and chairs, and came to a conclusion ... and that conclusion is in
> this
> > I-D.
>
> I request that our discussions related to adopted work and future
> discussions to be done on the list or within minutes. I think the WG
> should be able to be included in discussion between AD and authors,
> why WG was excluded?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> AB
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email