Re: [manet] (DLEP) Relative Link Quality and routing metrics

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Mon, 30 April 2018 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3F1126DFB for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxXBSC7n-6jw for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FFB126BF6 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id w3UL5JOA007520; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:19 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF276EB226; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id ymBdhvIhqikn; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABFCEEB21E; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:17 +0200
Message-ID: <876048xv5e.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvurC8EJZvSrQeuToszKFq+398ndNCCSjrnPz35evurPSmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGnRvupcyAKbR5mF8be_eKu5oKmAb-kW2xW19BJ7PHmPY_WQuA@mail.gmail.com> <1524222140.1526.7.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com> <CAGnRvup1CUQZ3QwKrVt-FOWkfkUiTpRbOPQQBZNRz1gqN2A8og@mail.gmail.com> <CALtoyonRfYH=RipL5LJLCfKzKcu-85jPdJo9wb5RWJRG1KeMDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGnRvurC8EJZvSrQeuToszKFq+398ndNCCSjrnPz35evurPSmg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:05:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5AE7850F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5AE7850F.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5AE7850F.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/mCgdpqua85vGtTZvNgeFIYmpNKA>
Subject: Re: [manet] (DLEP) Relative Link Quality and routing metrics
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:05:24 -0000

>> What we did at Cisco was to add to the route cost, based on how much RLQ had
>> dropped. A document on the route cost calculations (for OSPF) is at
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4t/ip_mobility/configuration/guide/ip_manet.html
>> Look for Section "OSPF Cost Calculation for VMI Interfaces". You'll see we
>> used a hard-coded '65535' in the calcuations, IIRC, (it's been a few years),
>> that's the maximum OSPF route cost.

> Interesting... yes, this is helpful.

It looks somewhat random to me.

-- Juliusz