Re: [manet] Removal of abandoned WG documents from Datatracker documents page

Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com> Sat, 27 May 2023 05:02 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A20C151989 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1aoP9Iq4uvJ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87771C151522 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f5685f902so212909866b.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685163723; x=1687755723; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=56fmSJBtcQVqQRyDFVSwyew70+/m/XhMyo/hEdQdeGI=; b=B/Z4WPzbZQm2n19gosqTqVQw9ySc9cwmiMUvAHhXKPoYuHqp3buP+1gLm8axswailn L0uwPSHLyqLJg9hIqXZ1J7NZLGsO1dab193aO2jN3ZyDRGRWKVa9uTRnerOYBoPGVjhN kUo92Zl3gwqN5IeCQFnG7EiaPRc1o0NoKKzY9vNTjlP3Ihv+TFMWu5ChM42cDzgmUtmq R7vcNcIqX7awGpwHR94qsM07TevaokDfxwxlghtixdjId+xmSVFOUSaEoQHjh0uAH6cq NN8aJAMiEzJMt471GkjsRstSWHbXqALoJpq4Z3k4ifM/KEAO/lHsyYT0JypS6SieyXrL YBiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685163723; x=1687755723; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=56fmSJBtcQVqQRyDFVSwyew70+/m/XhMyo/hEdQdeGI=; b=F0aD0+PWGVr/p7cXAMSLg9B+NXvpW61BqnjMPB5RYag8Uh+N9QibAyUeby9JakPhFe VR2TskAWgBnbyK7FNDPGUw2mUjoU8Ci+SeDTKSXSw2lZ/BR0E0+MvIjW1HH7z/JxfKGY O6eAp6V7xrVNhMQ3/A6ZQZs5XgIhFMd+AwZk+YfktCr7kkSU1b1KvIlZzoxwSVfAhXxj 0XSUfhn0m0l2Xn3FRZTo5No8HcNcy084D1Zannci3pT6F90kZwxAlaxqaMjTtcmX42Gn 3UVJXz1es63qPicHLHmzOGXz89hYikThW7fMC8S9niCE79NQXJIwmcDiO5lGHNGYdFhg rxew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzBFglKApj7W7Uygl7WMhULkCEVQlQTJRV6LZPnocQ4hQtV1lKZ W6GflFj3jRuy5Nx968JBsJaRHBqX86g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ589r25yypFYRowB6iG/s1zC0Wm7z0bTP/xswnCLPHqsshmoRErMR7ZmvfCKJC3aO+yvqM0oA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9704:b0:969:f9e8:a77c with SMTP id jg4-20020a170907970400b00969f9e8a77cmr4260509ejc.64.1685163723187; Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (82-132-224-186.dab.02.net. [82.132.224.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lz13-20020a170906fb0d00b0094f67ea6598sm2968096ejb.193.2023.05.26.22.02.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 May 2023 22:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christopher Dearlove <christopher.dearlove@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BC9F25D3-4756-4E7E-94AC-09955435E1A0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2F78414E-19A0-46C5-987D-0D798FC4BE06"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 06:01:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3a6668a7a33f4f4f8f1a0d66b5454b8a@tno.nl>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
To: "Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't" <Ronald.intVelt=40tno.nl@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <3a6668a7a33f4f4f8f1a0d66b5454b8a@tno.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/nPUSd514ecTRUT9SJA2CfK98q_4>
Subject: Re: [manet] Removal of abandoned WG documents from Datatracker documents page
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 05:02:08 -0000

Some of those are a blast from the past, some even before I was ever involved. I did check out a few to see if they had other than historical (or nostalgia) value, but I didn’t find any I would suggest not treating as indicated.

(Looking back, I see my first real contribution is an acknowledgement in a 2003 ID, but I’d been watching the group and using some of its work from I think 2000, maybe 1999.)

> On 27 May 2023, at 00:02, Velt, R. (Ronald) in 't <Ronald.intVelt=40tno.nl@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> MANET WG,
>  
> In an effort to acquaint himself with the work of the group, our new AD, Jim Guichard (welcome!) had a look at the Datatracker ‘documents’ page of the WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/manet/documents/) … and found he could not see the forest for the trees! Indeed, in the ‘Expired Internet-Drafts’ section, there is a long list of mostly ancient documents. Obviously, the DLEP credit-flow ones need to be revived, but the others are I-Ds that were accepted as WG documents at various points in the distant past and have since been abandoned for some reason or other. Apparently, the way to stop these drafts from showing up is to set their WG state to “Dead WG Document”.  This is, therefore, what the WG chairs intend to do, *unless* WG participants give us reasons to retain any of these.
>  
> The candidates for removal from the WG documents page are given below in reverse chronological order, from just old to near pre-historic:
>  
> I-D name / Title / Date
> draft-ietf-manet-report-mib-04 / Definition of Managed Objects for Performance Reporting / 2014-12-08
> draft-ietf-manet-dymo-mib-04 / Definition of Managed Objects for the DYMO Manet Routing Protocol / 2011-01-19
> draft-ietf-manet-lanmar-05 / Landmark Routing Protocol (LANMAR) for Large Scale Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-11-07
> draft-ietf-manet-odmrp-04 / On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP) for Ad-Hoc Networks / 2002-11-07
> draft-ietf-manet-zone-zrp-04 / The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-08-12
> draft-ietf-manet-zone-brp-02 / The Bordercast Resolution Protocol (BRP) for Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-07-05
> draft-ietf-manet-zone-iarp-02 / The Intrazone Routing Protocol (IARP) for Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-07-05
> draft-ietf-manet-zone-ierp-02 / The Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP) for Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-07-05
> draft-ietf-manet-fsr-03 / Fisheye State Routing Protocol (FSR) for Ad Hoc Networks / 2002-06-24
> draft-ietf-manet-bcast-00 / IP Flooding in Ad hoc Mobile Networks / 2001-11-26
> draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-04 / Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) Version 1 Functional Specification / 2001-07-25
> draft-ietf-manet-simple-mbcast-01 / A Simple Protocol for Multicast and Broadcast in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks / 2001-07-24
> draft-ietf-manet-admr-01 / The Adaptive Demand-Driven Multicast Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (ADMR) / 2001-07-17
> draft-ietf-manet-dsrflow-00 / Flow State in the Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks / 2001-03-07
> draft-ietf-manet-maodv-00 / Multicast Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (MAODV) Routing / 2000-07-25
> draft-ietf-manet-ddm-00 / Differential Destination Multicast (DDM) Specification / 2000-07-21
> draft-ietf-manet-insignia-01 / INSIGNIA / 1999-10-28
> draft-ietf-manet-star-00 / SOURCE TREE ADAPTIVE ROUTING (STAR) PROTOCOL / 1999-10-27
> draft-ietf-manet-rdmar-00 / Relative Distance Micro-discovery Ad Hoc Routing (RDMAR) Protocol / 1999-09-16
> draft-ietf-manet-cbrp-spec-01 / Cluster Based Routing Protocol(CBRP) Functional Specification / 1999-08-12
> draft-ietf-manet-longlived-adhoc-routing-00 / Long-lived Ad Hoc Routing based on the Concept of Associativity / 1999-03-31
> draft-ietf-manet-amris-spec-00 / Ad hoc Multicast Routing protocol utilizing Increasing id-numberS (AMRIS) Functional Specification / 1999-01-05
> draft-ietf-manet-term-01 / Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Terminology / 1998-11-18
> draft-ietf-manet-appl-00 / MANET Routing Protocol Applicability Statement / 1998-11-02
> draft-ietf-manet-cedar-spec-00 / Core Extraction Distributed Ad hoc Routing (CEDAR) Specification / 1998-10-05
> draft-ietf-manet-imep-spec-01 / An Internet MANET Encapsulation Protocol (IMEP) Specification / 1998-08-11
> draft-talpade-manet-amroute-00 / AMRoute: Adhoc Multicast Routing Protocol / 1998-08-06
>  
> In case you object to having the WG state of any of these I-Ds set to “Dead WG Document”, please let us know *before June 9th, 2023*.
>  
> Thanks,
> Don and Ronald
>  
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet