Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Fri, 10 May 2019 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702F212001E; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=cyafwf6Z; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Y0GKP6oi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uq-yimwbR5Ph; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654161201DB; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F352217D; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:49 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm3; bh=Z9y+V65audoRqHS/2pYUvNz HAXKFEkBAm0epfWNc/Rs=; b=cyafwf6ZPQj/eEk+EghmKGgVjx0FM/FdYAHMeSn c/R/LN4/HBrAs/gtTlBBgReX1MOborPvCycNUE3vGmv3boERlASZ22O73D2LfbG/ EbFJoDdhdNeyXVKpa+2UMWEKJvxcx/EPdCU6GCNMhzXz/CYkSJGA2vQkd7VtDNju neJftRroZUoLkpzE51hshgaZ2Tj1+ZuQFcMbySSEPYoEyiWgVS+qgFkLjK7SFGco FDeCMLr23FmxB0KUYrbX30MgBSVgTW3wPbAOWTx0pCoSuUi2NR+uXVMo2lkczYH/ URL0giA5Fb57207HDN9RznxA3xAHe8EOHL6/+ER8UEcHhIA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Z9y+V6 5audoRqHS/2pYUvNzHAXKFEkBAm0epfWNc/Rs=; b=Y0GKP6oio0KFRRymcFd0UM FzJgZrG8JAMzUWaUpJ9lzv+D6aGhm8bcz4pUYSKVQVLH4kedslw4rRONFZgEnUZg Hq1zwk1FefgPZeSB2YzWs41HlCF1Ji8iCJ7uL3c41ih7GXG+e9bzgdORhtAkIHzF 3YnJAZ1MM+x5lmvAd2aXHONfvZsT2N+RxP1OPOPA+Vh3BG75rtJnhNEOtPB/xlqH A2leZbIUWykUd00eh6K4dQf1DfGlBskcjYg7nxzvgCXBk1picWJw9GlaIxgwz8RF AMHuZirukYIe5vexwbOroj9xceouF+pyouhp8YQ7NvGjXnNG/N3Sujz0yKlFqMiw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AYXVXOWLpLJUMnv9x51EQEb9iAGTabsaLWfrJS-lQxZRGJMJTaaweg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeekgdejgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucfkphepudejfe drfeekrdduudejrdekjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegt ohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AYXVXGchwGldvBPBS5_Ii835st0KRO7wn-ipPF10bdwMVD61q2YOAA> <xmx:AYXVXPbdj5EiTBskWDWfD8mBzqpL4eXfUQJrTacx5d4bnC5PtHieVQ> <xmx:AYXVXKPwpetjqK9zkFgOu2vlB1wPImwwRR4y9xVfeVRAHASJYBNmRg> <xmx:AYXVXFlb3DAsEgq_jcNBhonuf_MrzRjrWrUgI3O2SPEpRRwAMbOlBg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.87]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 955FC10379; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <BEDBDD3E-6FE2-41CD-9474-7C955B578AF1@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2769B660-4FCD-4D69-8DA1-B73E293B02B8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszKk8ycnANbPvm_Q7-nu4hMGDB-xVwPNe0rsDTTHW0EUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@idirect.net>, manet-chairs@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension@ietf.org, manet@ietf.org
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <155492518369.22601.15786320586524280536.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESswp1BrNmOA1ariTegokJQOaGpi5YRGiVy3DYXiuxUGLwQ@mail.gmail.com> <6CBEC07D-A6E3-455C-87F8-6CB2DC0C1BDF@cooperw.in> <CAMMESsztHn9ufGfKbvxniyLK8u_54a0mn4vJ5_ZUpH7t9Q=U2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESszKk8ycnANbPvm_Q7-nu4hMGDB-xVwPNe0rsDTTHW0EUQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/ow7K2suB09w-I-Hn_fUcMvxpxGo>
Subject: Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-pause-extension-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:05:05 -0000

I cleared, but it would be good to think about a charter update to capture the full scope of the work the group is expecting to do.

Thanks,
Alissa

> On May 6, 2019, at 2:26 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alissa:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Do my answers satisfy your DISCUSS question?  If not, what are your expectations?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> On April 11, 2019 at 9:49:39 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>) wrote:
> 
>> On April 11, 2019 at 9:06:50 AM, Alissa Cooper (alissa@cooperw.in <mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>) wrote:
>> 
>>> Is there any scope limitation to the functionality that could potentially be characterized as further "development of DLEP"? I ask because from a quick read of the base specification, it doesn’t look like pause/resume was contemplated, and as you note this was not explicitly called out in the charter whereas credit windowing was. I’m wondering what the boundary is around the functionality DLEP is expected to provide as a protocol.
>> 
>> In short, I believe the boundary is simply “whatever the users need”.
>> 
>> When we re-chartered (a couple of years ago), the WG thought that credit windowing would be the focus (there was a document in progress, etc.), but that has changed to include this extension, and others.  The community working on DLEP is a very close-knit group with related (it not significantly overlapping) users — the focus of the work then follows what their users require.
>> 
>> At some point we should think about generalizing the charter.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Alvaro.
>>