[manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6130 (4866)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 15 November 2016 12:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14421129460 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kc0dFtAFUOSZ for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41CF12942F for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 820ECB80145; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:49:35 -0800 (PST)
To: T.Clausen@computer.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, jdean@itd.nrl.navy.mil, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, sratliff@idirect.net, bebemaster@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161115124935.820ECB80145@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:49:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/xbAMSExso6TYROASB9w4in7nCuk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:20:57 -0800
Cc: manet@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6130 (4866)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:49:37 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6130, "Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6130&eid=4866 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com> Section: 4.3.2 Original Text ------------- o For each MANET interface, within every time interval equal to the corresponding REFRESH_INTERVAL, sent HELLO messages MUST collectively include all of the relevant information in the corresponding Link Set and the Neighbor Information Base. Note that when determining whether to include information in a HELLO message, the sender MUST consider all times up to the latest time when it may send its next HELLO message on this MANET interface. o For each MANET interface, within every time interval equal to the corresponding REFRESH_INTERVAL, sent HELLO messages MUST collectively include all of the relevant information in the corresponding Link Set and the Neighbor Information Base. Corrected Text -------------- o For each MANET interface, within every time interval equal to the corresponding REFRESH_INTERVAL, sent HELLO messages MUST collectively include all of the relevant information in the corresponding Link Set and the Neighbor Information Base. Note that when determining whether to include information in a HELLO message, the sender MUST consider all times up to the latest time when it may send its next HELLO message on this MANET interface. Notes ----- The second statement is already contained in the first one. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6130 (draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) Publication Date : April 2011 Author(s) : T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, J. Dean Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6130 (4866) RFC Errata System
- Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6130 (… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [manet] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6130 (… Nikolai Malykh