IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] Misuse of ARF by spam-friendly ISPs

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Wed, 03 August 2011 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719FA11E80F0 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EjhedepDL9db for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B628E11E80A1 for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.41] (c-76-126-154-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.154.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p730gZvK028696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:42:37 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p730gZvK028696
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=fudge; t=1312332157; bh=iI9OEZ2gr9nwVlCHXd7ocDybBhVk7npXh0ZSrs0SG sY=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=A/mMirQ5gvcc XL5EMa8ubJl1ZYJ+9VOsLgoNbQ3/1NPO5dGGU9l5eGcrUSvblD435zCk8KFPDRd3nC7 AqV0XI10QT2QwF66EkLdKasRyhV4f0pfyV8jSzfIGT1mlIwL9ucCJTDNjSvrZP5HnBd wSi9HpTsQqwtjuymYLcnL1jU0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4CD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:42:35 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6F08584-07DB-4000-B5EB-0AD02AFD44E2@cybernothing.org>
References: <35734E6B-4579-4EF4-A139-7BFB4FA4573F@wordtothewise.com> <E41787825008234A9B8BB93D603C8B0F1707F7@bobo1.bobotek.net> <953887BF-E8AB-4246-8075-7EB50A7BF916@wordtothewise.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4CD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [marf] Misuse of ARF by spam-friendly ISPs
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:42:28 -0000

On Jul 30, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> I wonder if this could be mentioned in the BCP effort we're doing (JD?).

I suppose it could be added to the growing list of use cases that draft-jdfalk-marf-as specifically does not address, along with individual user submissions, virus/malware reports, churning monkey butter, et cetera.

> Failing that, if we decide to update the base document given the recent flurry of input, this could certainly go in there.  But it's too early to make that call, I think.

Sounds to me like what's actually needed is a BCP on accepting abuse reports from the general public -- maybe a task for the ASRG?

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email