Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B076021F8715 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8Huj3FPlbFb for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A66B21F86D9 for <marf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 2ELN1j0020ZaKgw01ELN87; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:20:31 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=vGmJt43tM7QA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=jex0pmakYXYPF1AzOL8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:20:01 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHNITXMIbyZo9yVYUqgbSkbCNchdJaqoG6QgAEn8gD//9F14A==
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:20:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039281022B8@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120423094450.10355.95358.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810193D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <4F97CC0C.6010209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F97CC0C.6010209@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335363632; bh=SQ4BGpKAhjTZjXUbNkZesZ32acbqmqm35Gd57YGo0ew=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=nZi3X87EGJfvLCO9bOJTdYqS8svVMHOkkX8UbAQ2/VOgTOBU4yV9+/4xrKlg2xxBD 5SCJ48K5YD3slMZm5qZv0mbW8XGnxc3FHEmCGhdCmyOpyioG2hX/qXEdF+1cL5sUjR WKHpW3G/OOJIj/ArpbPD2ZshJHW6FQDpK45sdXTM=
Cc: "draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-marf-as@tools.ietf.org>, "marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [marf] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:20:11 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:04 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: The IESG; marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-marf-
> as@tools.ietf.org; marf@ietf.org; me
> Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-marf-as-14: (with
> DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> Therefore, I'm in favor to mention how fraud, not-spam, virus should be
> used.

We would have if we had that information, but we don't.  As I mentioned in the Introduction for -15, they are either too new (not-spam) or see too little use for us to comment on them in this document in a useful way.

I don't know what we could do beyond saying that explicitly, which we've done, apart from delaying this document until we have that experience, which could theoretically be never.

If we do want it to advance, then I'm happy to hear suggestions about what text we could add that satisfies your concern.  Is it really just the title?

> Let me discuss this during the IETF telechat tomorrow, see what the
> others are thinking, and get back to you.

OK.

-MSK