Re: [martini] Impact of friends on martini-gin

  John is 100% correct. This will end up being more than a simple 
parameter and citation to an external document. We need a proper 
security analysis of the proposed solution, as well as a discussion 
about how it interacts with key registration technologies, like GRUU, 
outbound, 'reg' event, etc.

It's a separate solution, and deserves its own document.

/a

On 7/1/10 2:42 AM, Elwell, John wrote:
> We could equally well use a different URI parameter for the federated case, e.g., "bncf".
>
> John
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martien Huysmans
>> Sent: 01 July 2010 07:59
>> To: martini@ietf.org
>> Subject: [martini] Impact of friends on martini-gin
>>
>> In MARTINI Interim V martini-friends was discussed.
>> I think there is impact of friends on martini-gin.
>>
>> Friends makes a distinction between two modes of operation,
>> which are called basic and federated.
>> The basic mode is described in the current MARTINI-GIN.
>> The PBX would announce the used mode by setting the bulk
>> contact parameter to either "basic" or "federated".
>> This bulk contact parameter could be the bnc parameter.
>>
>> Regards Martien
>>
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini