IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] GIN temp GRUU

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9F33A67A3 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKgzX8dP8cXD for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01BC3A6A25 for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o61ITGdr021055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:29:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4C2CDE7C.5070003@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:29:16 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martien Huysmans <martien.huysmans@ericsson.com>
References: <0A5BADFA-AF90-454A-BB5F-6DA6259120C6@cisco.com> <B5CE2B521539624E8364D395B6F76B5C23D426043A@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <B5CE2B521539624E8364D395B6F76B5C23D426043A@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] GIN temp GRUU
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:29:18 -0000

  On 6/30/10 6:09 AM, Martien Huysmans wrote:
> In the mailing list also the option of a privacy service provided by the SSP
> was suggested, which when acting as B2BUA, would ensure that a party remains anonymous.
> No comments were posted on this suggestion.
> Can this be a viable alternative?

It certainly could be deployed (and we aren't doing anything to prevent 
it), but I'm extremely loathe to suggest a solution that requires an 
SBC-based architecture. We need to be able to solve the privacy problem 
for the general case, not just SBC-based networks.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email