Re: [martini] GIN temp GRUU

Martien Huysmans wrote:
> Hi
> 
> In the mailing list also the option of a privacy service provided by the SSP
> was suggested, which when acting as B2BUA, would ensure that a party remains anonymous.
> No comments were posted on this suggestion.
> Can this be a viable alternative?

I didn't see that mail - can you provide a reference?

What privacy service spec/features does this imply?

To provide full functionality, for every dialog it would have to insert 
a B2BUA, create a temp gruu to replace the supplied contact, and then 
route out-of-dialog requests for that temp-gruu to the calling UA. And 
it would have to inactivate that temp-gruu at some suitable time.

The real gruu mechanism seems less trouble.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Regards Martien
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 7:01 PM
> To: martini@ietf.org
> Subject: [martini] GIN temp GRUU
> 
> 
> I'm not OK with requiring out of band provisioning for K_e2. This would be a nightmare in practice. Could it be passed in the register response?
> 
> Having this as optional does not really work for me because most the US based customers doing PSTN replacement believe they are required to provide anonymous call. 
> 
> Overall, looks workable yet complicated - I wish there was a simpler way but I could live with this. 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
> 