[Masque] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Yes on draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I have some questions and one suggestion, and I believe addressing them will
improve the document.

- Section 2 : should it be HTTP/1.x instead of HTTP/1 :-)?
- Section 2 : it says

           "value MUST be treated as an HTTP/3 connection error of type
           H3_DATAGRAM_ERROR (0x33)"

     does this mean request stream MUST be aborted as it was also written in
     the section?

- Section 3 in general : I think we can be specific that "intermediaries" are
HTTP intermediaries as defined in HTTP semantic , as it is done in the
draft-masque-connect-udp?