[Masque] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Al Morton for the useful OpsDir review, and to the authors for
working with Al to address the comments -- I think that it noticeably improved
the document. I think that the document is both useful and clear -- but, while
copying my ballot comments from my tablet into the tool I read Rob's comments,
and strongly support his "what is this masque thing of which you speak?" (well,
how will anyone understand this is 10 years, and would e.g:
.well-known/udp-proxy be better?) and also his "a picture is worth a thousand
words comment -- having a simple ASCII art diagram explaining the players would
make this much much simpler for folk like myself to understand this mechanism.