Re: [Masque] Adoption call for draft-pauly-masque-quic-proxy

I also support adoption, joining others on the importance of being clear
about the privacy considerations.

(For discussion post-adoption, but it may be that clarification on safe
use-cases for this optimization might be practically better than an 80%
solution that loses much of the value of this optimization and misleads
people deploying it into thinking correlation is impossible.)

Best, Erik

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:35 PM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This email begins an adoption call for draft-pauly-masque-quic-proxy, one
> of the extensions listed in our working group's charter.
>
> The datatracker page for this document can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-masque-quic-proxy/
>
> And the GitHub repository can be found here:
> https://github.com/tfpauly/quic-proxy
>
> Please indicate whether or not you support adoption of this document in
> its current state as a starting point for the group's effort to address
> this item in our charter.
>
> As discussed during the meeting, publication of this document will not
> proceed without a complete understanding of the privacy implications of
> this optimization. A design team -- assuming this document is adopted --
> will endeavor to analyze and document the relevant privacy properties.
>
> This call for adoption will conclude on August 16.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris and Eric
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>