Re: [Masque] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: (with COMMENT)

[David Schinazi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Roman, thank you for your review!

Without launching into a philosophical conversation about
"what is a protocol?", I do prefer to avoid saying that "the
capsule protocol is not a protocol". I was thinking of tweaking
your text slightly to get to the same result:

    Definitions of new HTTP Upgrade Tokens that use the
    Capsule Protocol need to perform an appropriate security
    analysis that considers the impact of HTTP Datagrams and
    Capsules in the context of their protocol.

I wrote that up as the following PR:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram/pull/206

Thanks,
David

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:04 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to David Mandelberg for the SECDIR review.
>
> ** Section 4.  Consider adding the following clarification:
>
> NEW
> HTTP Datagrams and the Capsule Protocol are building blocks for HTTP
> extensions
> to define new behaviors or features and do not constitute an independent
> protocol.  Any extension adopting them will need to perform an appropriate
> security analysis which considers the impact of these features in the
> context
> of a complete protocol.
>
>
>
>