[Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 23 April 2023 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FFDC14CF09 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 00:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="bDO1ho2C"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="DB8mGTI0"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCuHtcpLUgQD for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 00:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79053C1524AA for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 00:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D5C32000CC for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 03:31:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 23 Apr 2023 03:31:39 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1682235098; x=1682321498; bh=Y/m8hQpOlRwjoZNK/29Jtpw8WTHTkmjUxcV MD0Cscug=; b=bDO1ho2CFGR6rFg8CL5iGBXVvtlVuKObsvBKY9of8ej7sutQm9j +Rzh+RGEbFeca5qm2hc0X6Lem0EIlfnAlD1RkI1ne5W8o+2GB4tYAfI/CW9IVYtI ohkqg5XPbdlaWFIqUEPU9+vXe9zX1ePPpWXJxSe5yvxttRSw28MPrgSzQtzLM6oz 4KeFDr9pKFw993/pQB92w8F5co47MWWG9+2RLjjuXnBY2QLBCa4E1tozpj2IfbIW izzsk4lxWBB4LANreiTeCkLn6SdPArEUlSij41Xh3e/HWY1VcEUAAUjVpZjARPSo F5MUkSs0yjRpfJFDy5Rktm6bbki3NgjG2zg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1682235098; x= 1682321498; bh=Y/m8hQpOlRwjoZNK/29Jtpw8WTHTkmjUxcVMD0Cscug=; b=D B8mGTI0E0NtBxC0jjEbj4LpzzYk6tN/rPLxCLkSAVzqywyfQjmzlX2nQ8zUD2pTG lXi3iZtPyDk/Q4J/jRd6jVEseDxv7iMBcltwgxoz71BPvtkru5qqq03HJQ8Ab1Yl F9ss5FUpGbA0eAXfMg13U0jjreX8CVinedXFwu8HHXiLvl1/Z9HYCSoNODL5JNVI H79z1KYCFlUElTVsrAVrhnwDMQp+uRJ8S27y6URF97chNmJH9b+Y+JGIAJG4h5oJ R5HHWgbFp/FjD/V+foPLw8VdPcRLpIF+YFW6nTw55MSi4a8L7ea9Ly0nVoDr+Fly sN5WWpGIkrSxPZ+MgIyQA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2t5EZKQnaRpK9voiZ-8A5bD83dCb0xPohKzFCjm1VTwoKDN1e3_dHQ> <xme:2t5EZPxUicNq2NfwivwvHrPuL4dz3Zp1nGefn3KAbofUA1XZeDtmlBh3AiK5ysl-6 0wZDEStXGlfdYW3eA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:2t5EZH3vg3vY-EA7D33UfNHexNhI42f9khPosu0UCfcbG_4KUW3U8s3I9ILxmQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfedtjedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2t5EZGCydpKJlZBfHqg7DAQd6uetMnDmMsw2wqvtYxC1iJJpL4ICxA> <xmx:2t5EZDj3j-3cZNt65mqNgPs0LxD4nyYFc1RfJWGRnz1j0kyMD9EWAw> <xmx:2t5EZCov73b4e3k8KWr14cIelg8TReaT0nB9r30FKUdNvKk7YYAAPQ> <xmx:2t5EZFerrLzqLdZc5omYugunM9-lgnaY50F6FvTjlGxm7HLd2QJWAQ>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 03:31:38 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6791360339329549385=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: masque@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20230423074738.79053C1524AA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 00:47:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/sy4j6Y-gg2LmIsm6cMSFVpEWbVw>
Subject: [Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:47:43 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip (+6/-6/💬25)
  6 issues created:
  - Treating differentiated services equally? (by bbriscoe)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/173 
  - Go through usage of client and server vs IP proxying endpoint (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/167 
  - Clarify that IPproto is a traffic filter parameter on the outermost IP header that is to be encapsulated by the tunnel (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/166 
  - Clarify the conceptual model of router vs link (Tunnel) (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/165 
  - Disabling congestion control a SHOULD? (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/164 
  - Mandate usage of HTTPS (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/163 

  6 issues received 25 new comments:
  - #167 Go through usage of client and server vs IP proxying endpoint (4 by DavidSchinazi, gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/167 
  - #166 Clarify that IPproto is a traffic filter parameter on the outermost IP header that is to be encapsulated by the tunnel (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/166 
  - #165 Clarify the conceptual model of router vs link (Tunnel) (5 by DavidSchinazi, gloinul, huitema)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/165 
  - #164 Disabling congestion control a SHOULD? (3 by DavidSchinazi, gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/164 
  - #163 Mandate usage of HTTPS (2 by DavidSchinazi, gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/163 
  - #152 Text on disabling congestion control (10 by achernya, bbriscoe, gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/152 

  6 issues closed:
  - Disabling congestion control a SHOULD? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/164 
  - Clarify the conceptual model of router vs link (Tunnel) https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/165 
  - Clarify that IPproto is a traffic filter parameter on the outermost IP header that is to be encapsulated by the tunnel https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/166 
  - Go through usage of client and server vs IP proxying endpoint https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/167 
  - Mandate usage of HTTPS https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/163 
  - Text on disabling congestion control https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/issues/152 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip (+6/-5/💬5)
  6 pull requests submitted:
  - Split up link operation and router operation (by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/172 
  - Define IP proxying endpoints and use it more (by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/171 
  - Add reference for nested CC issues (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/170 
  - Clarify ipproto scoping applies to outermost headers (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/169 
  - Require encryption (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/168 
  - Allow disabling congestion control for IP flows (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/162 

  2 pull requests received 5 new comments:
  - #170 Add reference for nested CC issues (3 by DavidSchinazi, mirjak, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/170 
  - #169 Clarify ipproto scoping applies to outermost headers (2 by DavidSchinazi, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/169 

  5 pull requests merged:
  - Split up link operation and router operation
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/172 
  - Clarify ipproto scoping applies to outermost headers
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/169 
  - Define IP proxying endpoints and use it more
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/171 
  - Require encryption
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/168 
  - Allow disabling congestion control for IP flows
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip/pull/162 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip