Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01

Tina

From: Jacni Qin [mailto:jacni@jacni.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:47 PM
To: Tina TSOU
Cc: Leonard Giuliano; Greg Shepherd; 'mboned@ietf.org'
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01

Hi authors,

Some questions about the "possible solutions" proposed,

3.1, as stated by itself, probably not reasonable from implementation standpoint.

For 3.2 and the first approach in 3.3, I guess they're ALGs, and IMHO, the discussions in Section 4.1 of the http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-v4v6-mcast-ps-00, are sufficient.

[Tina] R u suggesting that the Problem Statement is going too far into solution descriptions and should be cut back?

About the second approach in 3.3, not sure I fully understand it yet, but so far I see it also a kind of ALG.

Cheers,
Jacni

On 5/11/2012 Friday 1:49 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
Dear chairs,
Would you ask the WG for adoption of draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 as WG document?

Thank you and have a good day.

Tina and co-authors

From: Tina TSOU
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:58 AM
To: mboned@ietf.org<mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01

Now that the multicast transition framework document is officially accepted, is the Working Group prepared also to take on the topic of address acquisition, which is one of the tasks it identifies?
If so, would draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 be acceptable as a starting point?

Tina

_______________________________________________

MBONED mailing list

MBONED@ietf.org<mailto:MBONED@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned