IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01

Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com> Wed, 16 May 2012 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jacni@jacni.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE84121F86A0 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2012 17:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.943
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.344, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJxTTYnVnFwr for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2012 17:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv05.olivemail.cn (mx100.vip.olivemail.net [74.82.185.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CAA21F869E for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 17:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.olivemail.cn (unknown [202.105.21.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by srv05.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with ESMTPS id 68C5F3800E7 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 20:44:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from oray.cn (unknown [202.105.21.248]) by srv01.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with ESMTP id DCF1C3400C4 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.140.20.37] (unknown [64.104.125.217]) by app (Coremail) with SMTP id +AWowJDbj4lh+LJPyD_1AA--.30023S2; Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:19 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <4FB2F85F.60805@jacni.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:44:15 +0800
From: Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
References: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C9B185E@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C9CCCCE@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com> <4FB1B592.1090706@jacni.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80D3858EC@dfweml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80D3858EC@dfweml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060105000204000204040206"
X-CM-TRANSID: +AWowJDbj4lh+LJPyD_1AA--.30023S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7ZrWfCFWrGry7tr18KrW5trb_yoW8ZF1fpa 17Way7Kr4kJr4xC348ZF4rGr1F9FyUtrWUGF98Kr1jvFW5WF18Kw1av3y5t34UGrn8Aa4D ZF1xu34DuF13Z37anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU2Cb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8I cIk0rVWrJVCq3wAqx4xG67k08I80eVW5JVWrJwAqx4xG6c804VAFz4xC04v7Mc02F40Ew4 AK048IF2xKxVWUJVW8JwAqx4xG6xAIxVCFxsxG0wAqx4xG6I80eVA0xI0YY7vIx2IE14AG zxvEb7x7McIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0x vEwIxGrwCjr7xvwVCIw2I0I7xG6c02F41lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY 0x0EwIxGrwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0x ZFpf9x07jzyIUUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmdf0xo6mdu03lof0z/1tbiAQEKEko7lQ9FBwBIs5
Cc: "'mboned@ietf.org'" <mboned@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 00:44:24 -0000

Re-,

On 5/16/2012 Wednesday 4:24 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
>
> Tina
>
> *From:*Jacni Qin [mailto:jacni@jacni.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 14, 2012 6:47 PM
> *To:* Tina TSOU
> *Cc:* Leonard Giuliano; Greg Shepherd; 'mboned@ietf.org'
> *Subject:* Re: [MBONED] draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01
>
> Hi authors,
>
> Some questions about the "possible solutions" proposed,
>
> 3.1, as stated by itself, probably not reasonable from implementation 
> standpoint.
>
> For 3.2 and the first approach in 3.3, I guess they're ALGs,
>
Sorry, some words missed, "... they're ALGs and manual configuration, ..."

> and IMHO, the discussions in Section 4.1 of the 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-v4v6-mcast-ps-00, are 
> sufficient.
>
> [Tina] R u suggesting that the Problem Statement is going too far into 
> solution descriptions and should be cut back?
>
No, I don't think most of these are solutions, but just sort of analysis 
of deployment, to describe issues/problems maybe encountered, which have 
been discussed sufficiently in the Problem Statement.


Cheers,
Jacni
>
> About the second approach in 3.3, not sure I fully understand it yet, 
> but so far I see it also a kind of ALG.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni
>
> On 5/11/2012 Friday 1:49 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
>
> Dear chairs,
>
> Would you ask the WG for adoption of 
> draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 as WG document?
>
> Thank you and have a good day.
>
> Tina and co-authors
>
> *From:*Tina TSOU
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:58 AM
> *To:* mboned@ietf.org <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01
>
> Now that the multicast transition framework document is officially 
> accepted, is the Working Group prepared also to take on the topic of 
> address acquisition, which is one of the tasks it identifies?
>
> If so, would draft-tsou-mboned-multrans-addr-acquisition-01 be 
> acceptable as a starting point?
>
> Tina
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org  <mailto:MBONED@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email