Re: [MBONED] Proposed interim agenda

Jacni Qin <jacniq@gmail.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jacniq@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9ED21F89B3 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQizhHwC8LOs for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4FB21F8C47 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so894648obb.31 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jacniq@gmail.com designates 10.182.119.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.119.98;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jacniq@gmail.com designates 10.182.119.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jacniq@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jacniq@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.119.98]) by 10.182.119.98 with SMTP id kt2mr66607obb.9.1330608651835 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:30:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=n2MYMXBCfSYGxw0Zf7TD5KLugK6xXv+5iOGDDYDssOc=; b=u8lQlL4/ZgPY97gxAtymvtkRt3LoXV4VMn/CkH3ovJx+Y2xdJQrRRRwBRqS9SnkYQ2 rK7PRLSEUNVbRuG5RnS32BcoWAGl0RHOGHZDFpBbf1/X3zz74D03qDo+03yJbat1YeuV fAbAv28Pb5OPzjMq2xoJOX77TDoExaLorj2X0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.119.98 with SMTP id kt2mr57242obb.9.1330608651738; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.80.201 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:30:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C2E6650@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <mailman.8554.1329789090.3200.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7671A22DE@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <CABFReBq8W3imzbBijPgW=hbE=0tU3i-rTj9nvcx6Ury_D7ZqxQ@mail.gmail.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C2E6650@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:30:51 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHmj1WeGumtHDfn81NxMybb3zrEq1QO2SJ0KBxjKnFzBgcjwxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacni Qin <jacniq@gmail.com>
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444802b059ea004ba2e78ef"
Cc: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Proposed interim agenda
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:31:11 -0000

Re-,

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>wrote:

> 1. Welcome introduction and agenda bashing (mboned chairs)
>
> 2. What work items to be completed (all)
>
> 3. Discuss what should be the baseline overview? (all)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps-03
> or
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eubanks-mboned-transition-overview/
>
> 4. Outstanding issues discussion (all)
> a. The degree to which the AF is stateless.
> b. Which strategy looks more promising in the Address Acquisition draft?
> c. Routing crosses address boundaries, loop avoidance.
> d. What does the AF do when it lives on a machine that speaks IGMP or MLD
> out one side and PIM out the other? Does it translate between IGMP and MLD,
> or does it maintain all of the state that it needs to interface between
> IGMP or MLD and PIM?
>
> Much more of the No. 4 are in the solution space, I don't think it's
necessary to discuss those  before any conclusion or consensus are reached
on the Problems/Use Cases.


Cheers,
Jacni


> 5. Wrap-up: action items, next steps, AOB. (all)
>
>
> Tina
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>