Re: [MBONED] NVO3 Multicast Framework

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 16 May 2016 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C45D12DAEF for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMvulDHsix-R for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74DCA12DAEE for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id bt5so68411692pac.3 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=ZCxytsOJa1yPRdfECjdJEBcNHeXaI6QF6lV9zPGoO5U=; b=S4Lr3I1HCaAZuEgLcG6zNvr6nGStzT6jbhXEEhGwHKfEAe7rYGEgJcRui+xWpNqjdL 03VzlW8vdWtXA5FadVMif7ZJv0IjG34apwTGPDoSwRWWFIINWHE/WihyhYnpnUPSj7ms OxyHjPLWi4d27Cq4SX1SdWYnSvWoo+OjGNwPFsa9V0Ap3M4uTiLooj5k109x7UoCGbJA PjTe0xwMiJhYvb6mSltJohE0cOEM5S3VfA6m40G+ZM5GZrir0GZembxWZmRPcUSneNFb Yz+MJyAmVHy7TMlCa+dstj3SrTk92/XSP9iClveByX0KOhIIZDHWZBgRd116lJur75bK fLAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ZCxytsOJa1yPRdfECjdJEBcNHeXaI6QF6lV9zPGoO5U=; b=PptHQouFC8ayWn9hl6xIgHG2wSZfXBk6WdxsrdYBFBmiECFp6zQ+y/n4TD1lyZE9Nc agAaRi+mV4R5vQpaqH7ad0DN9TSV9LAebN4Njhk//7Wd4P030NIFCarTqLNgtORzkWAZ Gh3W+sOcpkYI9aEqz1r4V4SIX/nhx30BkWM1cpiHWUy0361nKyzc0XBm4uCxhhLfzTGG pQuA72EWT3W3dI5XhsawKM52vddksxTwmmYQGVZf6hdaQjuwulLmLls4A7UZB7SwWeR+ XT+CvIpx8yDRlpYmVlyx8xucFz9lZhmp6ftCoUBGl5/M1cboJr8H2Bc7ZU273rZtMXn9 ragA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUBO78PyDWsOQl1nRZkk6fnWmdpwH7rNs3FqXaPMngpeABb+aBn8TuLiZqvpnIyzw==
X-Received: by 10.66.47.196 with SMTP id f4mr48103286pan.126.1463437920003; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.31.21.100] ([116.6.104.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hk7sm49586874pad.25.2016.05.16.15.31.57 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FCF1A7FC-3C87-4841-8B23-6116520E5FD8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160512144607.T22764@sapphire.juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:57 -0700
Message-Id: <17B47CE8-D558-4748-88D6-FEC17A02357A@gmail.com>
References: <20160512144607.T22764@sapphire.juniper.net>
To: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/CWk9SKdtzlsBVMtrmZYoc9epF3Y>
Cc: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] NVO3 Multicast Framework
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 22:32:02 -0000

I just have one minor comment. Regarding the second paragraph:



Using LISP-signal-free does not mean the head-end must do replication. The draft indicates that a mapping system is used to decide where packets go. If the mapping database indicates that packets are encapsulated to multicast RLOCs, or unicast RLOCs, or both in one set, so be it.

And note if there is a single multicast RLOC, then there is no replication happening at the head-end, just one packet encapsulting multicast in multicast.

So what is written above is true, but it may be associated with an incorrect section title.

Dino

> On May 12, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net <mailto:lenny@juniper.net>> wrote:
> 
> MBONED,
> 
> The following draft recently went through WG last call in the NVO3 working group:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework/>
> 
> This doc covers multicast in data center overlay networks.  As you know, it is part of our charter in MBONED to provide feedback to other relevant working groups.  Please review and send any comments to the NVO3 WG mailing list (nvo3@ietf.org)- all comments will be greatly appreciated by NVO3.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned