Re: [MBONED] NVO3 Multicast Framework

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 16 May 2016 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACA712DAE7 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evmnveM35s-6 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x241.google.com (mail-pa0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C8F12DAE6 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x241.google.com with SMTP id rw9so1609670pab.2 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=X3OdP6QBCzFw2Za+wFiz7YExUcw0BgqCu300AvXQwjM=; b=glY0vf5KS2i9ZEAKsqP8DWdA6CvUeIg3fb2IlVdJWM8PIVlDX5BnGwa7M19nsshB3r /V0VjPkFBAUttCvc/8qTQJEgIcX2fx2HHsUJcR8PZFJrqoGUuvU0okrnACdNSYfQ+kR1 PAuaFhfgaRoPMw1QUh2eJ82jTb2sgs9ogvXYAzp3K7ZAIoDBj+VvCIIVRQhHLPx7jLzL CEK/laBJzwLJFO/q6nwcCM7ZFB02I8IYM/ywyMwGQLoi2BYWEy3EvV4pjwrp1SQgFPE6 wNmMkTtib7vGZnZXS9rf7cDHUBl1HkAdTeFWmB0EDusKOEYIU2aejg/W7Gp5J5nWnjSy 1dbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=X3OdP6QBCzFw2Za+wFiz7YExUcw0BgqCu300AvXQwjM=; b=Yb3Ehjs4L5PgcTfMCQbnniADzaRRaxxrKc7fr7NsphDO8nEzNbUoQhtmELxiybcnHe cB8fyuDefDLxNIYZhLWTIfPcdAQtAZ/7C3Z5zpPYcu23uSLUcie8qrZ9ODy2ouFAffam YUSLUFvBO7VQBi0bhcPZ2d3AEtX1JJ18jeN593TA5OXZGrdI+YogATqcell5hqWtR5eq J9QX15cbo/f2+5sNkJHycWYkihsrpzoOrilfQEMBgorL13Qo/1ZW0bNmJEl8z0rl9z+0 pSGhZY/kmZi7DPO+8fl/i45WlGj//3usN86nkYD4fgsGZLanDx04f0D/o6omPy+arVxW VMnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUySlDUQefF/QMuFO9gBNVMLxQEj5UqYN8gprC3Z0bE1tLLbfNcIzh9i3krIIKYkg==
X-Received: by 10.66.246.71 with SMTP id xu7mr48535521pac.17.1463437902163; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.31.21.100] ([116.6.104.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hk7sm49586874pad.25.2016.05.16.15.31.38 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5AD2F8BE-0CCA-424E-B0D6-961030AF229F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160512144607.T22764@sapphire.juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:31:38 -0700
Message-Id: <E1462EC2-0B53-462E-885D-814C2333D77F@gmail.com>
References: <20160512144607.T22764@sapphire.juniper.net>
To: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/pAOIt_ACvUO018p1PvMI0HRaI5Y>
Cc: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] NVO3 Multicast Framework
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 22:31:45 -0000

I just have one minor comment. Regarding the second paragraph:



Using LISP-signal-free does not mean the head-end must do replication. The draft indicates that a mapping system is used to decide where packets go. If the mapping database indicates that packets are encapsulated to multicast RLOCs, or unicast RLOCs, or both in one set, so be it.

And note if there is a single multicast RLOC, then there is no replication happening at the head-end, just one packet encapsulting multicast in multicast.

So what is written above is true, but it may be associated with an incorrect section title.

Dino

> On May 12, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net <mailto:lenny@juniper.net>> wrote:
> 
> MBONED,
> 
> The following draft recently went through WG last call in the NVO3 working group:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework/>
> 
> This doc covers multicast in data center overlay networks.  As you know, it is part of our charter in MBONED to provide feedback to other relevant working groups.  Please review and send any comments to the NVO3 WG mailing list (nvo3@ietf.org)- all comments will be greatly appreciated by NVO3.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned