IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] next step for mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm ??

"Mark Handley" <mark@handley.org.uk> Wed, 14 August 2019 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@handley.org.uk>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCE7120E9A for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPeJjZXsUWjs for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE731208E3 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722DC524 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap3 ([10.202.2.53]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:03:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=tpHm5tcbc4yqkfw8pZrK16hjAc+H0JNvW74kPZFva Ug=; b=xhZFm4Ax8GT+bVf5146loF010rysvTVT0CD1olv82n4tgHM2/qCW7vNKU rEDa9sUspXv3/aDx2sAI9yg7+80Sfs6+PjiEoB4utBKr4GmHkyf20gKkoDIHkk1j bSZ/guy12ZQPKOmeJnhkdqNFulBMzHNftzcsCeiZ7ulZ0K6SvnqRXKUEz7MCPDBs IPrn4u/vL2pNsDCRRJX40fLZdmYX+6DaoQa71kB6h/CR14V3hsfDPn7sIBEQAUZt bXsVu7Ldqrn9+pPBCiMB6MCBuk0A532lPJhR80GOL3CzU+qIP+d3OADv/9jybApw V0pctwYgOpCX6vClLHd3Du6i4wROw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Q4VUXat1Sxyn61Huwqw4BZ2hmr7ft1uQlsgJDkYk2pW6sFhJVgAlPg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddvledguddthecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgse htqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhkucfjrghnughlvgihfdcuoehmrghrkhes hhgrnhgulhgvhidrohhrghdruhhkqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmrghrkheshhgrnhgulhgvhidrohhrghdruhhknecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Q4VUXTuxoTyOItvOhr7YZTPd5TYn7TJ-SV8hRSgwjaazDslFnLAbUg> <xmx:Q4VUXQxlImSoZq6-5UEjI1M7BV2HGm1gVAV1w9jBl_EnfubdtJnx1A> <xmx:Q4VUXZjXfCeP7j1kvjgSyoxET_zk1R1AkAZQXc1RqyXI6fpNmgEe-Q> <xmx:RIVUXZZIxmEx6o6fC9K1Kx-Y84bsSQJMoW5tc-g8eFwXyrplAbnySA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 46D854E009F; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:03:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-869-g2d94aad-fmstable-20190814v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b3e6badb-0314-420e-b740-9747db29dcdc@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1908021255460.5418@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
References: <CAH8Jh6Bn_1TUS-0-pR4Mti0mzVMZ9hzYXiU_3QQJVr9iDCpnvg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1908021255460.5418@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 23:03:24 +0100
From: Mark Handley <mark@handley.org.uk>
To: mboned@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/GE5DpxuiQC0S76XzJ80JlbQ7AvE>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] next step for mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm ??
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 22:03:52 -0000

Generally this document looks good.  One minor nit, in section 5:

   Nevertheless, this document does not believe that any ASM solution,
   even with such future work, can ever provide the same intrinsic
   security and network and address management simplicity as SSM (see
   Section 3.2).  Instead, this document believes that future work for
   general purpose interdomain IP multicast is better spent on the SSM
   items listed in Section 4.

It's not really possible for a document to *believe* anything.  It would be better if this expressed the level of consensus - either "the authors believe" or stronger, "the mboned WG consensus is".  

Mark

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, at 8:59 PM, Leonard Giuliano wrote:
> 
> Jim- if there is rough consensus from the WG to advance the doc, it will 
> be submitted to IESG to request publication.  You email below helps with 
> this process, so thanks!
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, James A. (Jim) Stevens wrote:
> 
> | Although I have participated in several IETF working groups over the 
> past decades and provided feedback and comments to drafts, I really 
> don't understand the process of moving from draft to released RFC.
> | 
> | So I have to ask, what is the next step for the Internet draft 
> "Deprecating ASM for Interdomain Multicast" - - 
> draft-acg-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-03?
> | 
> | It looks good to me and provides useful guidance on applicability of 
> multicast within and between domains.  So I recommend that we move 
> forward onit.
> | 
> | Thanks,
> | Jim  Stevens
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email