Re: [MBONED] FW: [Secdispatch] Requesting agenda time for draft-krose-multicast-security"

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Jake for the clarification and additional MABR links.

Kind Regards

Gyan

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:49 PM Holland, Jake <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> From: Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>
> > Date: Sun,2022-04-03 at 11:25 AM
> > Hi Jake
> >
> > I agree that Multicast ABR standardization is valuable for operators as
> customers start shifting to OTT streaming services which we are seeing
> already from the pandemic.
> >
> > Does MBONE have MABR drafts already in progress?
>
> I don't think so.  The active doc list is in the datatracker:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mboned/documents/
>
> Although I would love to see more forward progress specifically on
> MABR, I think work on MABR-specific protocols would probably be out
> of scope for mboned.  The main reasons I wanted to point the note
> out to MBONED were:
>
> 1. it might wind up leading to a report about deployment status of
>    multicast, which is one of the things mentioned in the mboned charter
> 2. the reported improvements that were observed in practice by enabling
>    the use of multicast are also especially noteworthy
>
> Anyway, if MABR work happens at IETF, I'd expect that to fall under
> the ART area (and possibly somewhere in TSV if it's trying to use a
> new transport protocol), with hopefully some updates given to MBONED
> especially about deployment status.
>
> But I wouldn't expect to see such work adopted here, and I didn't intend
> to suggest we do so (though I would be interested to know if there's any
> work I'm not aware of yet, and I think some kind of list to track that
> might perhaps be in scope here as well as mops?)  Anyway, sorry if that
> caused any confusion.
>
> > I did a google search on MABR as far a standardization across SDOs and
> ITU came up.
> > https://www.itu.int/md/T17-SG09-C-0197/en
> >
> > DVB has a presentation on MABR
> >
> https://thebroadcastknowledge.com/2020/10/27/video-making-a-case-for-dvb-mabr/
> >
> > Another link about OTT and MABR
> >
> https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/smpte2020-finding-the-middle-ground-for-live-content-over-ott
>
> I would add at least a few more items to your list, namely a few of
> CableLabs' technical reports, as well as the MABR spec developed at
> DVB and the ROUTE/DASH work for ATSC 3.0:
>
> - IP Multicast Adaptive Bit Rate Architecture Technical Report
> (CableLabs OC-TR-IP-MULTI-ARCH-V01-141112)
>
> https://community.cablelabs.com/wiki/plugins/servlet/cablelabs/alfresco/download?id=51b3c11a-3ba4-40ab-b234-42700e0d4669
>
> - IP Multicast Controller-Server Interface Specification
> (CableLabs OC-TR-IP-MULTI-ARCH-C01-161026)
>
> https://community.cablelabs.com/wiki/plugins/servlet/cablelabs/alfresco/download?id=7102f5ad-f08e-42dc-8603-b4c2477e334e
>
> - IP Multicast Controller-Client Interface Specification
> (CableLabs OC-SP-MC-EMCI-I02-160923)
>
> https://community.cablelabs.com/wiki/plugins/servlet/cablelabs/alfresco/download?id=77eb9e28-c7ed-491a-98ba-f20507eb223e
>
> - Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB);
> Adaptive media streaming over IP multicast
> (ETSI TS 103 769 V1.1.1 (2020-11))
>
> https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103700_103799/103769/01.01.01_60/ts_103769v010101p.pdf
>
> - Signaling, Delivery, Synchronization, and Error Protection
> (ATSC A/331:2022-03)
>
> https://muygs2x2vhb2pjk6g160f1s8-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/A331-2022-03-Signaling-Delivery-Sync-FEC.pdf
> (Defines use of "Real-time Object delivery over Unidirectional Transport"
> for digital TV)
>
> HTH.
>
> -Jake
>
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*



*M 301 502-1347*